Comparative efficacy of digital panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography in locating mandibular foramen.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of panoramic radiographs (PAN) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in locating the position of the mandibular foramen (MF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients who underwent CBCT and panoramic imaging were included in the study. The location of the MF was evaluated anterior-posteriorly and superior-inferiorly on both CBCT and panoramic radiographs. Measurements were taken by two examiners, reviewed by a radiologist, and intra-examiner variability was assessed. A comparison of statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, independent and paired t-test. A p-value ≤0.05 was deemed significant.

RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 35.03 years, with 51% females and 49% males. CBCT and panoramic radiographs showed comparable accuracy in locating the left (p=0.937) and right (p=0.371) MF anterior-posteriorly. In the superior-inferior dimension, the accuracy of CBCT and panoramic radiographs were comparable in locating the right (p=0.292) and left (p=0.640) MF. The gender-based accuracy of PAN and CBCT radiographs in locating the right (p=0.353) and left (p=0.985) MF was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that panoramic radiographs showed comparable accuracy in effectively locating MF in comparison to CBCT. The influence of gender and anatomic location (right and left sides of MF) on MF identification with panoramic radiographs was insignificant. Digital panoramic radiographs are an effective tool in accurately identifying MF location in clinical practice.