We have located links that may give you full text access.
Fracture Resistance of Simulated Immature Teeth Filled with Three Types of Calcium Silicate Cement after Intracanal Medication with Ca(OH) 2 : An Ex Vivo Study.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 1-day fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth with an apical plug with ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, and RetroMTA after calcium hydroxide intracanal medication.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single-rooted human mandibular premolars were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. Firstly, to standardize the 9 mm root length, the crowns were cut off at and 9 mm below the cementoenamel junction transversely. Simulations for immature apices were carried out by using No. 1-6 Peeso reamers to pass through the apex to obtain a diameter of 1.7 mm at the apical opening. One group served as a negative control without any treatment, while the other groups received 30 days of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication. Four groups were plugs with 4 mm of ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, RetroMTA, and gutta-percha, respectively. The last one was served as a positive control group without filling inside. After 1 day of incubation, specimens were vertically loaded in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture occurred. The peak load to fracture (Newton) and fracture pattern were recorded. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD test was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: The highest mean load to fracture was shown in the negative control group (543.33 ± 37.17 N), followed by ProRoot MTA (432.82 ± 68.06 N), MTA Angelus (396.92 ± 59.93 N), RetroMTA (389.08 ± 56.25 N), and gutta-percha (283.28 ± 43.40 N), and the lowest belonged to the positive control group (239.98 ± 27.19 N). The significant differences were found between both the control and experimental groups with an apical plug with calcium silicate cement ( p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among those three apical plugs ( p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Apical plugs with ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, and RetroMTA had an immediate strengthening effect on simulated immature teeth after calcium hydroxide intracanal medication had been used.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted, single-rooted human mandibular premolars were randomly divided into six groups of 10 teeth each. Firstly, to standardize the 9 mm root length, the crowns were cut off at and 9 mm below the cementoenamel junction transversely. Simulations for immature apices were carried out by using No. 1-6 Peeso reamers to pass through the apex to obtain a diameter of 1.7 mm at the apical opening. One group served as a negative control without any treatment, while the other groups received 30 days of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication. Four groups were plugs with 4 mm of ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, RetroMTA, and gutta-percha, respectively. The last one was served as a positive control group without filling inside. After 1 day of incubation, specimens were vertically loaded in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until fracture occurred. The peak load to fracture (Newton) and fracture pattern were recorded. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's HSD test was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: The highest mean load to fracture was shown in the negative control group (543.33 ± 37.17 N), followed by ProRoot MTA (432.82 ± 68.06 N), MTA Angelus (396.92 ± 59.93 N), RetroMTA (389.08 ± 56.25 N), and gutta-percha (283.28 ± 43.40 N), and the lowest belonged to the positive control group (239.98 ± 27.19 N). The significant differences were found between both the control and experimental groups with an apical plug with calcium silicate cement ( p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among those three apical plugs ( p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Apical plugs with ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus, and RetroMTA had an immediate strengthening effect on simulated immature teeth after calcium hydroxide intracanal medication had been used.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app