We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool (PITT) for Spina Bifida Can Predict Ambulation and Transfer Ability in Adults with Spina Bifida.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2024 April 30
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool (PITT). It was hypothesized that PITT would have a good overall accuracy (>80%) for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability and that overall accuracy of PITT would be higher than that of other scales.
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was used to classify 409 adults with spina bifida according to seven neurological scales. A Naïve Bayes classifier was used to obtain accuracy estimates for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability as a function of each scale.
RESULTS: PITT was the only scale demonstrating >80% overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. While several scales demonstrated >80% overall accuracy in predicting transfer ability, none were useful in predicting inability to transfer. Inability to transfer was difficult for all tools to predict.
CONCLUSION: PITT demonstrated good overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. Sensory and anatomic levels were less useful than motor level in predicting functional ability.
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was used to classify 409 adults with spina bifida according to seven neurological scales. A Naïve Bayes classifier was used to obtain accuracy estimates for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability as a function of each scale.
RESULTS: PITT was the only scale demonstrating >80% overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. While several scales demonstrated >80% overall accuracy in predicting transfer ability, none were useful in predicting inability to transfer. Inability to transfer was difficult for all tools to predict.
CONCLUSION: PITT demonstrated good overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. Sensory and anatomic levels were less useful than motor level in predicting functional ability.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app