Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Various Ropivacaine Proportions in Cesarean Section.

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine (Ropi) is a widely utilized anesthetic in cesarean sections (CS), however its optimal dosage remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of varying doses (10mg, 5mg, 4mg, and 3mg) of Ropi in subarachnoid block (SA) for CS.

METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, and a total of 74 pregnant women undergoing CS at Nantong Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January and June 2023 were selected as the study population. Participants were stratified into groups based on Ropivacaine dosage: Group A (10 mg, n=18), Group B (5 mg, n=26), Group C (4 mg, n=15), and Group D (3 mg, n=15). The total Ropivacaine dosage administered via SA was consistently 10 mg across all groups. We measured anesthetic efficacy, safety profiles, abdominal wall muscle relaxation, pre- and post-anesthesia stress and inflammatory responses before and after anesthesia and compared among the four groups.

RESULTS: Group A exhibited the shortest onset time for block initiation and longest recovery duration (P < .05). Group D displayed the highest incidence of patients requiring additional anesthetics and experiencing adverse reactions, whereas the utilization rate of vasopressors was most pronounced in Group A (P < .05). Notably, Group D reported the lowest satisfaction rate regarding abdominal wall muscle relaxation (P < .05). Stress responses were significantly lower in Groups A, B, and C compared to Group D, while the levels of inflammatory factors in Groups B and C were higher than those in Group A but lower than those in Group D (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 4 mg hyperbaric Ropi in SA can achieve an optimal anesthesia effect in CS with a high level of safety, along with inducing mild abdominal wall muscle relaxation and attenuating stress and inflammatory responses pre- and post-anesthesia. Thus, it is recommended for clinical application.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app