We have located links that may give you full text access.
Identification of subgroups of patients with oesophageal cancer based on exercise intensity during prehabilitation.
Disability and Rehabilitation 2024 April 10
PURPOSE: To identify subgroups of patients with oesophageal cancer based on exercise intensity during prehabilitation, and to investigate whether training outcomes varied between subgroups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a multicentre cohort study were used, involving participants following prehabilitation before oesophagectomy. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using four cluster variables (intensity of aerobic exercise, the Borg score during resistance exercise, intensity of physical activity, and degree of fatigue). Aerobic capacity and muscle strength were estimated before and after prehabilitation.
RESULTS: In 64 participants, three clusters were identified based on exercise intensity. Cluster 1 ( n = 23) was characterised by fatigue and physical inactivity, cluster 2 ( n = 9) by a low training capacity, despite high physical activity levels, and cluster 3 ( n = 32) by a high training capacity. Cluster 1 showed the greatest improvement in aerobic capacity ( p = 0.37) and hand grip strength ( p = 0.03) during prehabilitation compared with other clusters.
CONCLUSIONS: This cluster analysis identified three subgroups with distinct patterns in exercise intensity during prehabilitation. Participants who were physically fit were able to train at high intensity. Fatigued participants trained at lower intensity but showed the greatest improvement. A small group of participants, despite being physically active, had a low training capacity and could be considered frail.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a multicentre cohort study were used, involving participants following prehabilitation before oesophagectomy. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using four cluster variables (intensity of aerobic exercise, the Borg score during resistance exercise, intensity of physical activity, and degree of fatigue). Aerobic capacity and muscle strength were estimated before and after prehabilitation.
RESULTS: In 64 participants, three clusters were identified based on exercise intensity. Cluster 1 ( n = 23) was characterised by fatigue and physical inactivity, cluster 2 ( n = 9) by a low training capacity, despite high physical activity levels, and cluster 3 ( n = 32) by a high training capacity. Cluster 1 showed the greatest improvement in aerobic capacity ( p = 0.37) and hand grip strength ( p = 0.03) during prehabilitation compared with other clusters.
CONCLUSIONS: This cluster analysis identified three subgroups with distinct patterns in exercise intensity during prehabilitation. Participants who were physically fit were able to train at high intensity. Fatigued participants trained at lower intensity but showed the greatest improvement. A small group of participants, despite being physically active, had a low training capacity and could be considered frail.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app