Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

CT radiomic features reproducibility of virtual non-contrast series derived from photon-counting CCTA datasets using a novel calcium-preserving reconstruction algorithm compared with standard non-contrast series: focusing on epicardial adipose tissue.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of computed tomography (CT) radiomic features (RFs) about Epicardial Adipose Tissue (EAT). The features derived from coronary photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) angiography datasets using the PureCalcium (VNCPC ) and conventional virtual non-contrast (VNCConv ) algorithm were compared with true non-contrast (TNC) series.

METHODS: RFs of EAT from 52 patients who underwent PCCT were quantified using VNCPC , VNCConv , and TNC series. The agreement of EAT volume (EATV) and EAT density (EATD) was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. A total of 1530 RFs were included. They are divided into 17 feature categories, each containing 90 RFs. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) were calculated to assess the reproducibility of RFs. The cutoff value considered indicative of reproducible features was > 0.75.

RESULTS: the VNCPC and VNCConv tended to underestimate EATVs and overestimate EATDs. Both EATV and EATD of VNCPC series showed higher correlation and agreement with TNC than VNCConv series. All types of RFs from VNCPC series showed greater reproducibility than VNCConv series. Across all image filters, the Square filter exhibited the highest level of reproducibility (ICC = 67/90, 74.4%; CCC = 67/90, 74.4%). GLDM_GrayLevelNonUniformity feature had the highest reproducibility in the original image (ICC = 0.957, CCC = 0.958), exhibiting a high degree of reproducibility across all image filters.

CONCLUSION: The accuracy evaluation of EATV and EATD and the reproducibility of RFs from VNCPC series make it an excellent substitute for TNC series exceeding VNCConv series.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app