Real-World Data from the Use of Ranolazine in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: The RANGER Study.

Background : Although ranolazine has been available for years as a second-line treatment to reduce angina attacks in patients with stable angina pectoris, real-world data on the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ranolazine are limited. Methods : A non-interventional, prospective study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of ranolazine. Patients eligible for enrolment had a baseline assessment between one and fourteen days after initiating ranolazine for the first time and a follow-up visit three months later. The primary endpoints comprised the weekly frequency of angina attacks, total adverse events, and ranolazine discontinuation rate. The secondary endpoints included the use of short-acting nitrates, changes on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification score and quality of life scale score (QoL). Results : In total, 1101 patients were enrolled at 214 sites. Mean weekly angina attacks were reduced from 3.6 ± 2.9 to 0.4 ± 0.9 ( p < 0.0001) and the mean weekly consumption of short-acting nitrates decreased by 1.7 ± 2.2 ( p < 0.0001). CCS class and QoL were also improved ( p < 0.0001). Adverse events were reported by 11 (1%) patients in total, while 2 of them (0.2%) were characterised as serious. Treatment was discontinued for various reasons in 23 patients (2.1%) after the follow-up period. Ranolazine treatment was equally effective in all subgroups tested, with larger benefits observed in patients with more frequent angina and CCS angina class III and IV. Up-titration of ranolazine during the study improved the outcomes. Conclusions : Ranolazine was well tolerated and effectively reduced angina attacks, with simultaneous improvement of the CCS class and QoL score in patients with stable angina.