Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Comparison of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Split Renal Function with 99m Tc-MAG3 Renography in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Carcinoma Treated with 177 Lu-PSMA.

Diagnostics 2024 March 9
BACKGROUND: Physiological PSMA expression in the cells of the proximal renal tubules and consecutive radiopharmaceutical binding and retention could potentially lead to radioligand-therapy-induced nephrotoxicity. Thus, patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergo 99m Tc-Mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) renal scintigraphy to assess kidney function and to exclude renal obstruction as part of their workup for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT). 99m Tc-MAG-3 renal scintigraphy often requires an additional visit to the nuclear medicine department and patients spend 30-90 min in the department, which is inconvenient and takes up camera time. In addition, the patients are subjected to a baseline 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT to assess for PSMA-positive disease prior to targeted radioligand therapy. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to compare 99m Tc-MAG-3-based split renal function (SRF) with 68 Ga-PSMA-derived SRF.

METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 28 patients with histologically proven metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received 177Lu-PSMA617. A comparison between the split renal function using 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and the 99m Tc-MAG-3-derived split renal function was carried out in 56 kidneys ( n = 56). The SRF on 68 Ga-PSMA was calculated using the volume and the average standard uptake value (SUVmean) within each VOI calculated as previously described by Roser et al.: SRF = ( VOLUMEright ) ∗ SUVmeanright /( VOLUMEright ∗ SUVmeanright + VOLUMEleft ∗ SUVmeanleft ). Paired tests and correlation coefficients were used to compare 68 Ga-PSMA and 99m Tc-MAG-3. A visual comparison of kidney morphology on both studies was also performed.

RESULTS: The median SRF of the right kidney was 49.9% (range: 3-91%) using 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 50.5% (range: 0-94%) with 99m Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy. Notably, there was a strong correlation between SRF measurements obtained from PSMA and 99m TcMAG3, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.957 ( p < 0.001). Both 99m Tc-MAG3 and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT studies identified morphological renal abnormalities; there were nine hydronephrotic kidneys, four shrunken kidneys and one obstructed kidney, and there was a strong positive correlation between 68 Ga-PSMA kidney morphology and 99m TcMAG3 renal scintigraphy kidney morphology, with a correlation coefficient of 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS: PSMA-derived split function demonstrated a high correlation with renal function assessed on diuretic 99m Tc-MAG3 renograms. PET-derived split renal function may, therefore, be considered an alternative to diuretic renogram-based split function. Furthermore, both 99m Tc-MAG3 and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT studies identified morphological renal abnormalities such as hydronephrosis, shrunken and obstructed kidneys. This correlation underscores the potential utility of 68 Ga-PSMA imaging as a valuable tool for assessing kidney morphology as an alternative to renogram split function in clinical practice.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app