Palliation of malignant esophageal stent esophagorespiratory fistula with rigid bronchoscope and Y silicone trachea stent: experience with seven patients.

BACKGROUND: Malignant esophageal stent esophagorespiratory fistula (ERF) is an abnormal communication between esophagus and airway among advanced tumor patients with indwelling esophageal stent, which is devastating and life-threatening. This study aims to provide a new feasible treatment scheme for malignant esophageal stent ERF and report its potential advantage compared with double stenting, which was recommended by European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guideline.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical data of malignant esophageal stent ERF patients between January 2018 to May 2023 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and divided them into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients treated with rigid bronchoscopy to remove the esophageal stent and implant Y silicone trachea stent, while group 2 consisted of patients treated with additional airway stenting without removing the esophageal stent. Demographic parameters, disease diagnoses and treatment, radiological findings before and after the intervention, and complications caused by the stents were obtained and analyzed with chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U , independent-samples t -tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and log-rank test.

RESULTS: Ten patients (seven patients in group 1 and three in group 2) were included. No procedure complications occurred in both groups. The mean Karnofsky Performance Score after the procedure significantly improved compared to the pre-procedure (57.14 vs. 77.14, P=0.001) in group 1, while decreased in group 2 (50 vs. 40, P=0.026). The control of pneumonia in group 1 patients is better than that in group 2. There was significant improvement in the degree of dysphagia after the procedure (3.86 vs. 2.43, P=0.002) in group 1, while no improvement was found in group 2 (4.00 vs. 3.33, P=0.423). The mean survival of group 1 was significantly longer group 2 (381.00 vs. 80.33 days, P<0.001, log-rank test). No patient needed stent repositioning due to migration in both groups. Cause of death in the group 1 included disease progression, novel coronavirus pneumonia, massive hemoptysis, and respiratory insufficiency, while group 2 included severe pneumonia and disease progression. No death was directly attributed to the procedure in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Removing the esophageal stent and implanting Y silicone trachea stent through a rigid bronchoscopy is a safe and feasible treatment for malignant esophageal stent ERF. This procedure can effectively seal the fistula, prevent from recurrent aspiration pneumonia, improve the quality of life, and prolong the survival time.