Clay modeling as a learning tool for medical trainees in urology: a narrative review and pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) necessitated a transition to virtual education which limits hands-on opportunities and student engagement. To adapt, a pilot study investigating clay modeling as an alternative educational tool for medical students was incorporated in a virtual and in-person sub-internship for prospective urology applicants. We aim to review the literature supporting the use of clay modeling in medical education as well as describe our experience with the activity as a way to engage trainees and evaluate early surgical skills.

METHODS: The current literature on clay modeling in medical and early surgical education was reviewed using multiple search queries in PubMed. A total of thirteen publications were identified and analyzed, with zero articles specifically discussing urological anatomy or surgery. The pilot study was conducted through the traditional in-person sub-internship as well as through a novel virtual sub-internship at a single academic U.S. Urology residency program. Students were instructed to create a three-dimensional model of a genitourinary organ using modeling clay. Anonymized surveys were collected. Responses of virtual and in-person students were compared.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: Clay modeling has been shown in the literature to be beneficial in medical and early surgical education through the use of active learning. Twenty-five total virtual (N=6) and in-person (N=19) students participated in the clay modeling activity. Survey ratings were mixed, with 100% positive responses amongst the virtual group in the areas of "relevance" and "creatively challenging" compared to the in-person cohort, 31.6% of whom responded positively to "relevance" and 47.4% for "creatively challenging" respectively. Overall, students responded positively for the exercise being "creatively challenging" (n=15, 60%) and "enjoyable" (n=16, 64%). Positive results echoed the student perspectives described in the current literature on clay modeling.

CONCLUSIONS: Clay modeling has previously been used in the in-person classroom setting as a learning supplement or replacement for dissection classes but has not been previously described for use in the virtual learning environment or within the field of Urology. With ongoing need to develop novel teaching modalities, clay modeling may be a unique tool to enhance learning, and evaluate technical skill, and boost engagement for medical trainees.