Establishment of the molecular subtypes and a risk model for stomach adenocarcinoma based on genes related to reactive oxygen species.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress promotes the development of stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) and resistance of STAD patients to chemotherapy. This study developed a risk classification and prognostic model for STAD based on genes related to oxidative stress.

METHODS: Univariate Cox regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression analysis were performed using transcriptome data of STAD from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related genes from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) website to develop a risk model. Genetic landscape, pathway characteristics and immune characteristics between the two risk groups were assessed to evaluate patients' response to anti-tumor therapy. Further, a nomogram was created to evaluate the clinical outcomes of STAD patients. The mRNA levels of genes were detected by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR).

RESULTS: Two ROS-related molecular subtypes (subtype C1 and C2) were classified, with subtype C2 having unfavorable prognosis, higher immune score, and greater infiltration of macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), mast cells, regulatory T cells, and C-C chemokine receptor (CCR). Five ROS-related genes (ASCL2, COMP, NOX1, PEG10, and VPREB3) were screened to develop a prognostic model, the robustness of which was validated in TCGA and external cohorts. RT-qPCR analysis showed that ASCL2, COMP, NOX1, and PEG10 were upregulated, while the mRNA level of VPREB3 was downregulated in gastric cancer cells. The risk score showed a negative relation to tumor mutation burden (TMB). Low-risk patients exhibited higher mutation frequencies of TTN, SYNE1, and ARID1A, higher response rate to immunotherapy and were more sensitive to 32 traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, while high-risk patients were sensitive to 13 drugs. Calibration curve and DCA confirmed the accuracy and reliability of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION: These findings provided novel understanding on the mechanism of ROS in STAD. The current study developed a ROS-related signature to help predict the prognosis of patients suffering from STAD and to guide personalized treatment.