Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Alterations of Lacrimal Sac Microbiota in Failed Dacryocystorhinostomy: The Lacriome Paper 6.

PURPOSE: To study the metagenomics of the microbes isolated from the lacrimal sac in patients with failed dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 10 consecutive patients with failed DCR. Lacrimal sac samples were obtained for metagenomic analysis during the revision endoscopic DCR. The samples were collected intraoperatively after a full-length lacrimal sac marsupialization and immediately transported on ice to the laboratory. A whole shotgun metagenome sequencing was performed on the IlluminaTM platform following DNA extraction and library preparation. The downstream analysis of the samples was performed using various software packaged in the Squeeze Metapipeline v1.3.0 and marker gene-based metagenomic phylogenetic analysis using MetaPhlAn4.

RESULTS: The five major phyla identified across the samples of failed DCR include Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria (Figure 1). The prevalent species include Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Pseudomonas juntendi, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter ursingii, Citrobacter koseri, and Cutibacterium acnes (Figure 2). Among the other organisms identified, few were from genera candida and mezorhizobium. Among the viruses, the most abundant was the BeAn 58058 virus. It was interesting to note the occasional presence of plasmodium and toxoplasma species. The functional category distribution of KEGG (Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes) data showed microbial metabolism to be the most involved function, followed by cellular processes.

CONCLUSION: This is the first whole metagenome sequencing of the lacrimal sac contents from failed DCR patients. The organisms identified varied significantly from those isolated from patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) using similar techniques and reflect altered lacrimal microbiota in surgically unsuccessful DCRs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app