Impact of the extent and location of liver split on future liver remnant hypertrophy after portal vein ligation in a rat model.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the role and mechanism of liver parenchyma transection in accelerating the regeneration of future liver remnants in rats with portal vein ligation (PVL).

METHODS: Rats were randomly divided into the PVL group (90% PVL at the caudate lobe, right lobe , left lateral lobe and left median lobe), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (portal vein ligation with complete liver parenchyma transection [ALPPS]) group (90% PVL with 80 to 90% liver parenchyma transection), PVL + partial liver partition (PLP) group (90% PVL with 30 to 50% liver parenchyma transection), PVL + partition in the ligated lobe (PLL) group (90% PVL with 40 to 60% liver parenchyma transection in the portal vein ligated lobe), PVL + partition in the remnant lobe (PRL) group (90% PVL with 40 to 60% liver parenchyma transection in the remnant lobe), PVL + radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group (90% PVL with splenic ablation) and sham operation (sham) group. The animals were killed at 4 time points of postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Six rats were killed at each time point, with 24 rats in each group. The weights of the future liver remnant and whole liver were measured. Serum alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin were analyzed by using an automatic biochemical analyzer. Serum tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, and hepatocyte growth factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The expression of cell proliferating nuclear antigen (Ki67) and phosphorylated histone H3 was detected by immunohistochemistry, and the positive rate was calculated.

RESULTS: The ALPPS group displayed the highest FLR weight to body weight ratio compared with that of the other groups (P < .05), and the partial liver split (PVL + PLP) group also displayed higher remnant weight to body weight ratio than the ectopic liver split (PVL + PLL and PVL + PRL) groups (P < .05). During the first 7 days after surgery the cytokine levels of the ALPPS, PVL + PLP, PVL + PLL and PVL + PRL groups were comparable (P > .05). The PVL + PLP, PVL + PLL, PVL + PRL and PVL + RFA groups showed similar necrotic areas in the portal vein ligated lobe (P > .05). A hemodynamic study revealed that a liver split along the demarcation line could further increase the portal pressure of the FLR and both the split site and completeness were associated with portal hemodynamic alternations and liver hypertrophy. Extrahepatic organ injury (eg, spleen ablation) also has a significant impact on portal hemodynamics and liver regeneration.

CONCLUSION: Complete liver splitting along the demarcation line induced higher portal vein pressure and more rapid FLR hypertrophy than partial or ectopic liver splitting after PVL. The portal hemodynamic alterations after liver split rather than inflammatory cytokine release may be the major cause of ALPPS-induced rapid liver hypertrophy.