Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term Change of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bowel dysfunction, also known low anterior resection syndrome, is common in rectal cancer survivors and significantly impacts quality of life. Although long-term longitudinal follow-up is lacking, improvement of the syndrome is commonly believed to happen only within the first two years.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to depict the longitudinal evolvement of low anterior resection syndrome beyond 3 years and explores factors associated with the change.

DESIGN: Longitudinal long-term follow-ups were performed for the single center with the largest cohort within the multi-center FOWARC randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: A quaternary referral center.

PATIENTS: Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer who received long-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, followed by sphincter-preserving radical proctectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Change of low anterior resection syndrome score and stoma status.

RESULTS: Of the 220 patients responding to the first follow-up at a median of 39 months, 178 (80.9%) responded to the second follow-up after a median of 83 months. During the interval, mean low anterior resection syndrome score improved from 29.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.3-30.7) to 18.6 (95% CI 16.6-20.6). 56 (31.5%) patients reported improvement from major to no/minor severity, and 6 (3.4%) patients had new stoma due to severe bowel dysfunction. Neoadjuvant radiation (p = 0.016) was independently and negatively associated with improvement of the score.

LIMITATIONS: Loss of follow-up during the long-term follow-ups.

CONCLUSION: Most rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome continued to improve beyond 3 years after proctectomy. Neoadjuvant radiation was negatively associated with long-term improvement of low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app