We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative study of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and surgery for recurrent cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions following surgery.
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 2024 Februrary 18
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) and surgery in treating recurrent cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) after surgery due to precancerous lesions.
METHODS: A total of 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after surgery for precancerous lesions were studied retrospectively. Patients underwent ALA-PDT or surgery and were followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and then every six months after that. Clinical data were collected and the efficacy and safety of the two treatment methods were compared.
RESULTS: Of the 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after conization, 15 cases received ALA-PDT and 26 received surgery. At the six-month follow-up, the lesions' complete remission (CR) rate was 93.33 % in ALA-PDT group and 88.46% in the surgery group. The human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance rates were 66.67% and 73.08%, respectively. No significant differences concerning the lesions' CR rate and the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). At the twelve-month follow-up, the HPV clearance rates were 80.00% and 91.67%. No significant differences concerning the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). In the surgery group, the HPV clearance rate and the lesions' CR rate were lower in patients over 45 years of age (25.00% vs. 81.82%, P=0.031; 50.00% vs. 95.45%, P=0.052). During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, none of the patients progressed. In women treated with ALA-PDT, there was no vaginal bleeding, and no harmful effects on the cervical organizational structure or functions compared to the surgery group, and two women delivered successfully after ALA-PDT treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ALA-PDT was similar to that of surgery in treating recurrent cervical HSIL following surgery, with fewer side effects.
METHODS: A total of 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after surgery for precancerous lesions were studied retrospectively. Patients underwent ALA-PDT or surgery and were followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and then every six months after that. Clinical data were collected and the efficacy and safety of the two treatment methods were compared.
RESULTS: Of the 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after conization, 15 cases received ALA-PDT and 26 received surgery. At the six-month follow-up, the lesions' complete remission (CR) rate was 93.33 % in ALA-PDT group and 88.46% in the surgery group. The human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance rates were 66.67% and 73.08%, respectively. No significant differences concerning the lesions' CR rate and the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). At the twelve-month follow-up, the HPV clearance rates were 80.00% and 91.67%. No significant differences concerning the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). In the surgery group, the HPV clearance rate and the lesions' CR rate were lower in patients over 45 years of age (25.00% vs. 81.82%, P=0.031; 50.00% vs. 95.45%, P=0.052). During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, none of the patients progressed. In women treated with ALA-PDT, there was no vaginal bleeding, and no harmful effects on the cervical organizational structure or functions compared to the surgery group, and two women delivered successfully after ALA-PDT treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ALA-PDT was similar to that of surgery in treating recurrent cervical HSIL following surgery, with fewer side effects.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app