Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Arthroscopic and Radiographic Features Distinguish Femoral Head Deformity from Idiopathic Cam, Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, and Recurrent Cam After Slipped Epiphysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hip impingement from slipped epiphysis and idiopathic cam is well known but not fully differentiated. Idiopathic cam can be a result of an undiagnosed slip. The mechanism of remodeling of slipped epiphysis deformity has also been controversial. The causes of recurrent femoral head deformity and new impingement beyond progression of the slip have not been studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of hips treated by arthroscopic femoral neck osteoplasty for impingement from slipped epiphysis were compared with a series of hips treated for idiopathic cam impingement. Demographics and clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic features were retrospectively retrieved. The same parameters were studied in another consecutive series of hips treated for slipped epiphysis and developed recurrent pain from impingement. The deformity was analyzed to understand the causes of recurrence in these hips. The medial most point where the femoral head sphericity ended was called the Alpha point and the tissue covering the bone at the Alpha point was identified.

RESULTS: Children with idiopathic cam were older, had less pain and limp, and less clinical deformity compared to those with slipped epiphysis. The damage pattern was chondrolabral separation and acetabular cartilage debonding from the subchondral bone by an articular cartilage covered bump in idiopathic cam impingement, while it was labral crushing and labral and cartilage abrasion by metaphyseal bone in slip impingement. Recurrent cam deformities after initial slips were from epiphyseal extension similar to the idiopathic cam deformity in 7 out of 9 hips.

DISCUSSION: Slipped epiphysis and idiopathic cam seem to be distinct entities at the time of presentation. They were different in all findings except for having pain with flexion and internal rotation in both groups. Remodeling of slip deformity seems to occur by wear of the metaphyseal prominence on the acetabulum. Recurrence or worsening of cam deformity in slips occurred by growth of the epiphysis on to the neck anteriorly which can appear as a decrease in the posterior slip. The relationship of the Alpha point to the physeal scar and the tissue covering the femoral head at the Alpha point help differentiate between epiphyseal and metaphyseal cam deformities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 retrospective comparative study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app