We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hyperopic LASIK and Postoperative Corneal Steepness: Revisiting the 49D Limit.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2024 Februrary 2
PURPOSE: To compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) outcomes of hyperopic laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a postoperative corneal steepness above versus below 49D.
SETTING: Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2019. Hyperopic patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative corneal steepness with steep corneas defined >49.0D and the control group ≤ 49.0D. Adjustments were performed to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,703 eyes of 1,703 patients were included. Mean age was 48.3 ± 10.0 years and 45.3% were male. Preoperatively, the steep group (2.4%, n=41/1703) had steeper mean (44.6D vs 43.1D, p<0.001) and steep (45.1D vs 43.5D, p<0.001) keratometry, worse logMAR BCVA (0.07 vs 0.04, p=0.02) and higher sphere (4.9D vs 2.9D, p<0.001). Intraoperatively, they had a higher spherical treatment (4.6D vs 2.8D, p<0.001). Following hyperopic LASIK, the steep group had worse logMAR BCVA (0.10 vs 0.06, p=0.01). However, after accounting for differences in baseline and spherical treatment, no significant differences were found in postoperative logMAR BCVA (0.06 vs 0.06, p=0.99). The factors that remained associated with worse postoperative BCVA were higher spherical treatment (0.01 logMAR per 1D, p<0.001) and preoperative BCVA (0.60 logMAR per 1.00 logMAR, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative corneal steepness greater than 49D is not associated with worse visual outcomes following hyperopic LASIK. However, lower preoperative visual potential and higher spherical treatment applied are associated with worse outcomes. The 49D cut-off should be revisited.
SETTING: Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent hyperopic LASIK between January 2013 and December 2019. Hyperopic patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative corneal steepness with steep corneas defined >49.0D and the control group ≤ 49.0D. Adjustments were performed to account for differences in baseline and intraoperative parameters.
RESULTS: Overall, 1,703 eyes of 1,703 patients were included. Mean age was 48.3 ± 10.0 years and 45.3% were male. Preoperatively, the steep group (2.4%, n=41/1703) had steeper mean (44.6D vs 43.1D, p<0.001) and steep (45.1D vs 43.5D, p<0.001) keratometry, worse logMAR BCVA (0.07 vs 0.04, p=0.02) and higher sphere (4.9D vs 2.9D, p<0.001). Intraoperatively, they had a higher spherical treatment (4.6D vs 2.8D, p<0.001). Following hyperopic LASIK, the steep group had worse logMAR BCVA (0.10 vs 0.06, p=0.01). However, after accounting for differences in baseline and spherical treatment, no significant differences were found in postoperative logMAR BCVA (0.06 vs 0.06, p=0.99). The factors that remained associated with worse postoperative BCVA were higher spherical treatment (0.01 logMAR per 1D, p<0.001) and preoperative BCVA (0.60 logMAR per 1.00 logMAR, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative corneal steepness greater than 49D is not associated with worse visual outcomes following hyperopic LASIK. However, lower preoperative visual potential and higher spherical treatment applied are associated with worse outcomes. The 49D cut-off should be revisited.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app