Qualification of a flow cytometry-based method for the evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity of GTA002 natural killer cell therapy.

BACKGROUND: Natural Killer (NK) cell-based therapies represent a ground-breaking opportunity for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. NK cell manufacturing under good manufacturing practice (GMP) is complex and requires attentive assessment the product's safety and efficacy through quality control (QC). Release testing includes monitoring of in vitro cell expansion, differentiation, purity, phenotype, and cytotoxicity. As NK cells are biologically active products, the establishment of potency methods is particularly relevant; surrogate or improper assays can lead to rejection of qualifiable batches or to release of products that falsely meet potency specifications, potentially causing low efficacy during clinical trials. As cell-based therapeutics are highly heterogeneous, no universal guidelines for product characterization are available, and developers must invest significant effort in establishing and validating robust and fit-to-purpose assays. In this study, we describe the qualification procedure of a flow cytometry-based analytical method to assess in vitro potency of GTA002 NK cells, to be applied to oNKord®/inaleucel allogeneic off-the-shelf NK cell product from Glycostem Therapeutics, undergoing a Phase I/IIa clinical trial in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (NCT04632316).

METHODS: First, we established multi-color flow cytometry panels to quantitatively determine the count of effector (E) GTA002 cells and leukemia target (T) K562 cells alone and in co-culture at different E:T ratios (10:1, 3:1, 1:1). Effector potency was then qualitatively expressed as percentage of cytotoxicity. Next, we defined protocols for method qualification to assess the pivotal features of the assays, including accuracy, precision, linearity, range, specificity, robustness, and carryover; quantitative acceptance criteria were determined for all parameters. Results of the qualification procedure are reported and discussed against pre-defined acceptance criteria.

RESULTS: Overall, our methods show robust performance across all parameters, ensuring QC-compliant assessment of NK cell potency as part of the release test panel for clinical batches. Notably, we identified relevant aspects to address when progressing towards method validation to support pivotal clinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS: This article provides a "case-study" of how analytical method development for cell therapeutics is planned and executed from early clinical stages, anticipating the need to establish robust procedures to overcome scientific and regulatory challenges during method validation.