We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sacubitril/valsartan improves the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
Coronary Artery Disease 2024 Februrary 2
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to provide evidence for expanding the clinical application of SV.
METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SV in patients with AMI. The article was screened and evaluated by the Cochrane 5.1.0 bias risk assessment tool. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis of the outcome indicators.
RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 7230 patients were included. The results showed that SV increased left ventricular eject fraction (MD = 2.86, 95% CI [1.81-3.90], P < 0.00001) and reduced readmission rate (RR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.32-0.68], P < 0.0001), decreased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (MD = -477.46, 95% CI [-914.96 to -39.96], P = 0.03), and reduced major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (RR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.27-0.85], P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse reaction (AR) between the trial group and the control group (RR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.60-1.30], P = 0.52).
CONCLUSION: SV can effectively improve the prognosis of AMI, prevent complications, and there is no significant difference in safety compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker.
METHODS: PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SV in patients with AMI. The article was screened and evaluated by the Cochrane 5.1.0 bias risk assessment tool. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis of the outcome indicators.
RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 7230 patients were included. The results showed that SV increased left ventricular eject fraction (MD = 2.86, 95% CI [1.81-3.90], P < 0.00001) and reduced readmission rate (RR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.32-0.68], P < 0.0001), decreased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (MD = -477.46, 95% CI [-914.96 to -39.96], P = 0.03), and reduced major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (RR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.27-0.85], P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse reaction (AR) between the trial group and the control group (RR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.60-1.30], P = 0.52).
CONCLUSION: SV can effectively improve the prognosis of AMI, prevent complications, and there is no significant difference in safety compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app