Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Effectiveness of bone grafting versus cannulated screw fixation in the treatment of posterolateral tibial plateau compression fractures with concomitant ACL injury: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral tibial plateau compression fractures (PTPCF) are one of the significant factors leading to knee instability and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure. The effectiveness of fixation for such cases without the use of metal implants remains inconclusive. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the fixation with isolated bone grafting is stable enough for the treatment of PTPCF with concomitant ACL injuries.

METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients treated for concomitant ACL injuries and PTPCF in authors' institution. A total of 53 patients (21 males and 32 females) with an average age of 47.43 ± 14.71 years were included. Patient data were collected, including factors leading to injury, affected side, height, weight, and basic medical history. The posterior inclination angle and the lateral tibial plateau lateral inclination angle were measured to evaluate the fixation stability. Rasmussen functional score and HSS score were used to assess the knee functional recovery.

RESULTS: The bone grafting group achieved satisfactory levels of Rasmussen score (28.22 ± 0.85) and HSS knee joint function scores (95.57 ± 1.97). The cannulated screw fixation group had a Rasmussen knee joint function score of 28.70 ± 0.92 and a HSS knee joint function score of 96.07 ± 1.93. No statistically significant difference was found (P > 0.05). The cannulated screw fixation group had a mean posterior inclination angle reduction loss of 0.20° ± 1.11°, while the bone grafting group had a reduction loss of 0.18° ± 1.01°, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). The cannulated screw fixation group had a lateral inclination angle reduction loss of 0.01° ± 0.37°, and the bone grafting group had a reduction loss of 0.03° ± 0.43°, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The use of bone grafting for fixation of PTPCF with accompanying ACL injuries demonstrated no substantial disparities in knee joint function. In cases of simple PTPCF, filling and compacting the bone defect underneath the tibial plateau fracture fragment can yield satisfactory fixation, obviating the necessity for supplementary cannulate screw fixation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app