Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Assessing views and attitudes toward the use of extended reality and its implications in neurosurgical education: a survey of neurosurgical trainees.

Neurosurgical Focus 2024 January
OBJECTIVE: Extended reality (XR) systems, including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality, have rapidly emerged as new technologies capable of changing the way neurosurgeons prepare for cases. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate the perspectives of neurosurgical trainees on the integration of these technologies into neurosurgical education.

METHODS: A 20-question cross-sectional survey was administered to neurosurgical residents and fellows to evaluate perceptions of the use of XR in neurosurgical training. Respondents evaluated each statement using a modified Likert scale (1-5).

RESULTS: One hundred sixteen responses were recorded, with 59.5% of participants completing more than 90% of the questions. Approximately 59% of participants reported having institutional access to XR technologies. The majority of XR users (72%) believed it was effective for simulating surgical situations, compared with only 41% for those who did not have access to XR. Most respondents (61%) agreed that XR could become a standard in neurosurgical education and a cost-effective training tool (60%). Creating patient-specific anatomical XR models was considered relatively easy by 56% of respondents. Those with XR access reported finding it easier to create intraoperative models (58%) than those without access. A significant percentage (79%) agreed on the need for technical skill training outside the operating room (OR), especially among those without XR access (82%). There was general agreement (60%) regarding the specific need for XR. XR was perceived as effectively simulating stress in the OR. Regarding clinical outcomes, 61% believed XR improved efficiency and safety and 48% agreed it enhanced resection margins. Major barriers to XR integration included lack of ample training hours and/or time to use XR amid daily clinical obligations (63%).

CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this study indicate that there is broad agreement among neurosurgical trainees that XR holds potential as a training modality in neurosurgical education. Moreover, trainees who have access to XR technologies tend to hold more positive perceptions regarding the benefits of XR in their training. This finding suggests that the availability of XR resources can positively influence trainees' attitudes and beliefs regarding the utility of these technologies in their education and training.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app