Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.

Sleep Health 2023 December 10
AIMS: Evaluate the performance of 6 wearable sleep trackers across 4 classes (EEG-based headband, research-grade actigraphy, iteratively improved consumer tracker, low-cost consumer tracker).

FOCUS TECHNOLOGY: Dreem 3 headband, Actigraph GT9X, Oura Ring Gen3, Fitbit Sense, Xiaomi Mi Band 7, Axtro Fit3.

REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY: In-lab polysomnography with 3-reader, consensus sleep scoring.

SAMPLE: Sixty participants (26 males) across 3 age groups (18-30, 31-50, and 51-70years).

DESIGN: Overnight in a sleep laboratory from habitual sleep time to wake time.

CORE ANALYTICS: Discrepancy and epoch-by-epoch analyses for sleep/wake (2-stage) and sleep-stage (4-stage; wake/light/deep/rapid eye movement) classification (devices vs. polysomnography).

CORE OUTCOMES: EEG-based Dreem performed the best (2-stage kappa=0.76, 4-stage kappa=0.76-0.86) with the lowest total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep onset discrepancies vs. polysomnography. This was followed by the iteratively improved consumer trackers: Oura (2-stage kappa=0.64, 4-stage kappa=0.55-0.70) and Fitbit (2-stage kappa=0.58, 4-stage kappa=0.45-0.60) which had comparable total sleep time and sleep efficiency discrepancies that outperformed accelerometry-only Actigraph (2-stage kappa=0.47). The low-cost consumer trackers had poorest overall performance (2-stage kappa<0.31, 4-stage kappa<0.33).

IMPORTANT ADDITIONAL OUTCOMES: Proportional biases were driven by nights with poorer sleep (longer sleep onset latencies and/or wake after sleep onset).

CORE CONCLUSION: EEG-based Dreem is recommended when evaluating poor quality sleep or when highest accuracy sleep-staging is required. Iteratively improved non-EEG sleep trackers (Oura, Fitbit) balance classification accuracy with well-tolerated, and economic deployment at-scale, and are recommended for studies involving mostly healthy sleepers. The low-cost trackers, can log time in bed but are not recommended for research use.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app