We have located links that may give you full text access.
Computer vision-based assessment of cyclist-tram track interactions for predictive modeling of crossing success.
Journal of Safety Research 2023 December
INTRODUCTION: Single Bicycle Brashes (SBCs) are common, and underreported in official statistics. In urban environments, light rail tram tracks are a frequent factor, however, they have not yet been the subject of engineering analysis.
METHOD: This study employs video-based analysis at nine Dublin city centre locations and introduces a predictive model for crossing success on tram tracks, utilising cyclist crossing angles within a Surrogate Measure of Safety (SMoS) framework. Additionally, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were explored for automatic estimation of crossing angles.
RESULTS: Modelling results indicate that cyclist crossing angle is a strong predictor of crossing success, and that cyclist velocity is not. Findings also highlight the prevalence of external factors which limit crossing angles for cyclists. In particular, kerbs are a common factor, along with passing/approaching vehicles or other cyclists. Furthermore, results indicate that further training on a relatively small sample of 100 domain-specific examples can achieve substantial accuracy improvements for cyclist detection (from 0.31AP0.5 to 0.98AP0.5 ) and crossing angle inference from traffic camera footage.
CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring safe crossing angles is important for cyclist safety around tram tracks. Infrastructural planners should aim for intuitive, self-explainable road layouts that allow for and encourage crossing angles of 60° or more - ideally 90°.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The SMoS framework and the open-source SafeCross1 application offer actionable insights and tools for enhancing cyclist safety around tram tracks.
METHOD: This study employs video-based analysis at nine Dublin city centre locations and introduces a predictive model for crossing success on tram tracks, utilising cyclist crossing angles within a Surrogate Measure of Safety (SMoS) framework. Additionally, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) were explored for automatic estimation of crossing angles.
RESULTS: Modelling results indicate that cyclist crossing angle is a strong predictor of crossing success, and that cyclist velocity is not. Findings also highlight the prevalence of external factors which limit crossing angles for cyclists. In particular, kerbs are a common factor, along with passing/approaching vehicles or other cyclists. Furthermore, results indicate that further training on a relatively small sample of 100 domain-specific examples can achieve substantial accuracy improvements for cyclist detection (from 0.31AP0.5 to 0.98AP0.5 ) and crossing angle inference from traffic camera footage.
CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring safe crossing angles is important for cyclist safety around tram tracks. Infrastructural planners should aim for intuitive, self-explainable road layouts that allow for and encourage crossing angles of 60° or more - ideally 90°.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: The SMoS framework and the open-source SafeCross1 application offer actionable insights and tools for enhancing cyclist safety around tram tracks.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app