The Role of Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) and Line Immunoassay (LIA) in the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Diseases and Their Clinical Correlation: An Observational Study From a Tertiary Care Center in Bihar.

Background and aim The presence of distinct sets of autoantigens and autoantibodies bestow these autoimmune diseases (ADs) with specific immune profiles or fingerprints, which has cleared the diagnostic dilemma associated with these ADs. This study was planned to collate and compare the reporting of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) with line immunoassay (LIA) and their clinical correlations. This study was conducted to investigate the association between the reporting of anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) screening by IIF and ANA profile reporting by LIA. Additionally, it aimed to explore the association of ANA pattern detection by IIF with the detection of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens by LIA and the association of autoantibody detection by LIA with clinical diagnosis. Methodology A total of 98 samples from patients suspected of having ADs were subjected to both IIF and LIA, and results were correlated with clinical diagnosis. Results In the homogenous pattern noted by IIF, the clustered antigens identified by LIA included dsDNA, Nucleosome, Histone, and Mi-2. In the speckled pattern, the identified antigens were SS-A/Ro52, P0, SS-A/Ro60, SS-B/La, and U1-snRNP. On the other hand, the nucleolar pattern revealed antigens AMA M2, PCNA, and CENP-B. The centromere pattern was mostly associated with CENP-B. The speckled pattern was found to be most commonly associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The most common autoantibody found in total ANA profile-positive samples was anti-U1-snRNP followed by anti-SS-A/Ro60 and anti-SS-B/La, and all three were found to be associated with SLE. Conclusions SLE was the most common AD identified in our study samples, with the speckled pattern being the most common pattern on IIF and anti-U1-snRNP being the most common ANA identified by LIA. The fluorescence pattern of IIF predicts the presence of specific antibodies. LIA should be reserved for IIF-positive but dubious cases and whose signs and symptoms are nebulous and do not match the disease dictated by IIF.