We have located links that may give you full text access.
Case Series: Mixed Infectious Keratitis by Pythium insidiosum and Fungal Species.
Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry 2023 November 29
SIGNIFICANCE: This case series will be the first to illustrates mixed infection from Pythium sp. and fungal species in corneal ulcer.
PURPOSE: This case series is aimed to alert all towards the possibility of both Pythium sp. and fungal species infection in case of non-responding corneal ulcer treated with either antifungals or anti-pythium drugs alone. Increased suspicion of mixed infection in case of non-responding fungal/pythium keratitis may facilitate early and prompt management.
CASE REPORTS: Six patients presented with signs of either fungal or pythium keratitis. They underwent ophthalmological examinations, smear examinations, cultures, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) was performed in cases where symptoms worsened after treatment with either antifungal or anti-pythium drugs. The half corneal button (HCB) was shared for histopathological and microbiological examinations. In the first case, smear examination from corneal scraping (CS) revealed Pythium-like filaments, which were confirmed with PCR; however, Aspergillus nidulans grew in culture. In the second case, iodine-potassium iodide (IKI) staining was positive for Pythium; however, PCR was positive for both Pythium and fungus, which was further confirmed by DNA sequencing. In the third case, IKI staining and HCB were positive for Pythium; however, PCR was positive for fungus, which was identified as Candida saitoana with DNA sequencing. In the fourth case, Pythium grew in the CS culture; however, Candida sp. grew in the HCB culture. In the fifth case, Cladosporium sp. grew in culture from CS; however, Pythiuminsidiosum grew from the anterior chamber exudate after TPK. In the sixth case, smear examination revealed septate fungal filaments, and Cladosporium sp. grew in culture; however, HCB on histopathological examination showed features of Pythium keratitis.
CONCLUSIONS: In unresponsive cases of Pythium or fungal keratitis, diagnostic modalities such as IKI and PCR should be implemented as a routine practice, in addition to smears and cultures.
PURPOSE: This case series is aimed to alert all towards the possibility of both Pythium sp. and fungal species infection in case of non-responding corneal ulcer treated with either antifungals or anti-pythium drugs alone. Increased suspicion of mixed infection in case of non-responding fungal/pythium keratitis may facilitate early and prompt management.
CASE REPORTS: Six patients presented with signs of either fungal or pythium keratitis. They underwent ophthalmological examinations, smear examinations, cultures, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) was performed in cases where symptoms worsened after treatment with either antifungal or anti-pythium drugs. The half corneal button (HCB) was shared for histopathological and microbiological examinations. In the first case, smear examination from corneal scraping (CS) revealed Pythium-like filaments, which were confirmed with PCR; however, Aspergillus nidulans grew in culture. In the second case, iodine-potassium iodide (IKI) staining was positive for Pythium; however, PCR was positive for both Pythium and fungus, which was further confirmed by DNA sequencing. In the third case, IKI staining and HCB were positive for Pythium; however, PCR was positive for fungus, which was identified as Candida saitoana with DNA sequencing. In the fourth case, Pythium grew in the CS culture; however, Candida sp. grew in the HCB culture. In the fifth case, Cladosporium sp. grew in culture from CS; however, Pythiuminsidiosum grew from the anterior chamber exudate after TPK. In the sixth case, smear examination revealed septate fungal filaments, and Cladosporium sp. grew in culture; however, HCB on histopathological examination showed features of Pythium keratitis.
CONCLUSIONS: In unresponsive cases of Pythium or fungal keratitis, diagnostic modalities such as IKI and PCR should be implemented as a routine practice, in addition to smears and cultures.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app