Evaluation of Stem Cell Laden Collagen + Polycaprolactone + Multi-Walled Carbon Nano-Tubes Nano-Neural Scaffold with and Without Insulin Like Growth Factor-I For Sciatic Nerve Regeneration Post Crush Injury in Wistar Rats.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: All body functions are activated, synchronized and controlled by a substantial, complex network, the nervous system. Upon injury, pathophysiology of the nerve injury proceeds through different paths. The axon may undergo a degenerative retraction from the site of injury for a short distance unless the injury is near to the cell body, in which case it continues to the soma and undergoes retrograde neuronal degeneration. Otherwise, the distal section suffers from Wallerian degeneration, which is marked by axonal swelling, spheroids, and cytoskeleton degeneration. The objective of the study was to evaluate the potential of mesenchymal stem cell laden neural scaffold and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) in nerve regeneration following sciatic nerve injury in a rat model.

METHODS: The animals were anaesthetized and a cranio-lateral incision over left thigh was made. Sciatic nerve was exposed and crush injury was introduced for 90 seconds using haemostat at second locking position. The muscle and skin were sutured in routine fashion and thus the rat model of sciatic crush injury was prepared. The animal models were equally distributed into 5 different groups namely A, B, C, D and E and treated with phosphate buffer saline (PBS), carbon nanotubes based neural scaffold only, scaffold with IGF-I, stem cell laden scaffold and stem cell laden scaffold with IGF-I respectively. In vitro scaffold testing was performed. The nerve regeneration was assessed based on physico-neuronal, biochemical, histopathological examination, and relative expression of NRP-1, NRP-2 and GAP-43 and scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS: Sciatic nerve injury model with crush injury produced for 90 seconds was standardized and successfully used in this study. All the biochemical parameters were in normal range in all the groups indicating no scaffold related changes. Physico-neuronal, histopathological, relative gene expression and scanning electron microscopy observations revealed appreciable nerve regeneration in groups E and D, followed by C and B. Restricted to no regeneration was observed in group A.

CONCLUSION: Carbon nanotubes based scaffold provided electro-conductivity for proper neuronal regeneration while rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells were found to induce axonal sprouting, cellular transformation; whereas IGF-I induced stem cell differentiation, myelin synthesis, angiogenesis and muscle differentiation.