Sniff and reverse-sniff nasal respiratory pressures after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A single-center prospective study.

BACKGROUND: and objective: This study examined the validity of sniff nasal inspiratory (SNIP) and reverse-sniff nasal expiratory pressures (RSNEP) for estimating respiratory muscle strength and for predicting poor life expectancy following exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS: This prospective study included patients who were admitted for COPD exacerbation and underwent rehabilitation. At hospital discharge, SNIP, RSNEP, and maximum mouth inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) were measured, and the body mass index, degree of airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index was calculated by evaluating body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ), the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, and 6-min walk distance.

RESULTS: Data from 43 patients (mean age 76.8 years, FEV1 42.8 % predicted) were analyzed. SNIP and RSNEP were moderately correlated with MIP and MEP, respectively. Bland-Altman plot means of SNIP (48.3 ± 17.5) and RSNEP (44.7 ± 23.8 cmH2 O) were lower than those of MIP (54.8 ± 19.9) and MEP (76.4 ± 31.2 cmH2 O), respectively, and the SNIP-MIP and RSNEP-MEP 95 % limits of agreement were wide. Logistic regression showed that SNIP and RSNEP were significantly associated with BODE score ≥7 (poor life expectancy), and predictive accuracy was 81.4 % when combining SNIP ≤49 and RSNEP ≤42 cmH2 O.

CONCLUSION: After exacerbation in patients with COPD, SNIP and RSNEP are useful indicators that complement MIP and MEP. Furthermore, a combined SNIP and RSNEP test may be beneficial in predicting poor life expectancy.