Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Microbiome Analysis of Organic and Conventional Chickens Processed Using Whole Carcass Enrichment and Rinse Methods.

Investigating the chicken microbiome is important to establish control measures for pathogens to protect consumers. This study aimed at evaluating the comparative efficiency of human pathogen detection through 16S rRNA sequencing of organic and conventional chickens processed using whole carcass enrichment (WCE) and rinse (WCR) methods. Organic and conventional whole broiler carcasses (n=31) were vigorously shaken with 500 mL buffered peptone water (BPW). For the rinse method, a 30 mL aliquot was mixed with 30 mL of BPW. The rest of the sample, including the carcass, was used for the enrichment method. All samples were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The samples were divided into five groups [Negative Control: only BPW without chicken (n=5), Organic-Rinsed (n=7), -Enriched (n=8), Conventional -Rinsed (n=7), and -Enriched (n=9)]. Fifty milliliters of each sample were subjected to DNA extraction followed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes predominated the microbiota of both conventional and organic chickens, followed by low abundances of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacterium. While the abundance of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes remained unchanged in organic chicken irrespective of the methods used, a noticeable shift in the Proteobacteria and Firmicutes ratio (59%:39% in rinsed to 38%:60% in enriched) was observed in conventional chicken. Furthermore, the choice of method did not yield any differences in Abundance-Based Coverage Estimator, and Jackknife, among conventional and organic chickens but resulted in a statistically significant difference in the Shannon, Simpson, Chao1, and phylogenetic diversity indices (p<0.05). The relative abundance of Salmonella and Campylobacter was less than 0.1%. The results suggested the WCE method provides a broad range of information on the chicken microbiome.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app