We have located links that may give you full text access.
Association of clinical signs of chorioamnionitis with histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes in women with premature rupture of membranes.
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice 2023 September
BACKGROUND: Premature rupture of membrane (PROM), especially when preterm or prolonged is associated with an increased risk of chorioamnionitis with its attendant feto-maternal complications.
AIM: The study was aimed to determine the association of clinical signs of chorioamnionitis with histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes in women with PROM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible participants with clinical diagnosis of PROM at gestational age of ≥28 weeks managed between December 2018 and June 2019 were consecutively recruited. Their sociodemographic characteristics, obstetrics history, and evidence of clinical chorioamnionitis using the Gibb's criteria were obtained. Following delivery, chorioamnionitis was histologically confirmed. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of women with PROM and histological chorioamnionitis that were detected clinically.
RESULTS: Of the 136 participants analyzed, 108 (79.4%) had term PROM, while 28 (20.6%) had preterm PROM (<37 weeks). The prevalence of histological chorioamnionitis was 50.0% compared to 16.2% using clinical indicators of infection. Histological chorioamnionitis was almost two times higher in preterm than term PROM (71.4% vs 38.9%). About two-third (67.6%) of the chorioamnionitis identified histologically were missed using clinical signs of chorioamnionitis. Clinical signs of chorioamnionitis had specificity of 100.0%, but low sensitivity (35.5%) and accuracy of 70.6%. A combination of three symptoms, maternal pyrexia and tachycardia, and fetal tachycardia appears to be the most reliable clinical indicator of chorioamnionitis in women with preterm PROM. There was a significant association between low birth weight, low Apgar score, NICU admission, and the presence of histological chorioamnionitis in women that had PROM.
CONCLUSION: Clinical signs of chorioamnionitis have a low sensitivity and are not very accuracy in diagnosing chorioamnionitis in women with PROM.
AIM: The study was aimed to determine the association of clinical signs of chorioamnionitis with histological chorioamnionitis and neonatal outcomes in women with PROM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible participants with clinical diagnosis of PROM at gestational age of ≥28 weeks managed between December 2018 and June 2019 were consecutively recruited. Their sociodemographic characteristics, obstetrics history, and evidence of clinical chorioamnionitis using the Gibb's criteria were obtained. Following delivery, chorioamnionitis was histologically confirmed. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of women with PROM and histological chorioamnionitis that were detected clinically.
RESULTS: Of the 136 participants analyzed, 108 (79.4%) had term PROM, while 28 (20.6%) had preterm PROM (<37 weeks). The prevalence of histological chorioamnionitis was 50.0% compared to 16.2% using clinical indicators of infection. Histological chorioamnionitis was almost two times higher in preterm than term PROM (71.4% vs 38.9%). About two-third (67.6%) of the chorioamnionitis identified histologically were missed using clinical signs of chorioamnionitis. Clinical signs of chorioamnionitis had specificity of 100.0%, but low sensitivity (35.5%) and accuracy of 70.6%. A combination of three symptoms, maternal pyrexia and tachycardia, and fetal tachycardia appears to be the most reliable clinical indicator of chorioamnionitis in women with preterm PROM. There was a significant association between low birth weight, low Apgar score, NICU admission, and the presence of histological chorioamnionitis in women that had PROM.
CONCLUSION: Clinical signs of chorioamnionitis have a low sensitivity and are not very accuracy in diagnosing chorioamnionitis in women with PROM.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app