We have located links that may give you full text access.
EFFICACYOF ENDOSCOPIC RESUTURING VERSUS PHARMACOTHERAPY TO TREAT WEIGHT RECIDIVISM AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTROPLASTY.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2023 July 19
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A subset of patients experience weight recidivism after primary endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (P-ESG). Available options for management of weight regain include initiation of anti-obesity medications (AOM) or redo ESG (R-ESG). The comparative effectiveness of these options is not clear.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ESG. From 2013 to 2021, 79 patients who were started on AOM, or underwent R-ESG for management of weight recidivisim after P-ESG were included. The primary outcome of this study was final total body weight loss (TBWL) at the end of follow up.
RESULTS: Fifty five patients were started on AOM and 24 patients underwent R-ESG. The age, gender distribution and baseline BMI did not differ significantly between groups. The proportion of non-compliant patients (defined as patients who missed their first post ESG follow up visit) was significantly higher in the AOM group compared with R-ESG group (67% versus 35%, p=0.012). The additional TBWL after R-ESG was significantly (both clinically and statistically) better than after initiation of AOM (9.5±7.2% versus 2.1±8.6%, p=0.001). Final TBWL clearly favored R-ESG over AOM for treatment of weight recidivism (19.9±10.4% versus 13.6±9.2%, p=0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: R-ESG is an effective treatment to induce weight loss after experiencing weight recidivism. These results highlight an important advantage of ESG as a repeatable minimally-invasive procedure.
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing ESG. From 2013 to 2021, 79 patients who were started on AOM, or underwent R-ESG for management of weight recidivisim after P-ESG were included. The primary outcome of this study was final total body weight loss (TBWL) at the end of follow up.
RESULTS: Fifty five patients were started on AOM and 24 patients underwent R-ESG. The age, gender distribution and baseline BMI did not differ significantly between groups. The proportion of non-compliant patients (defined as patients who missed their first post ESG follow up visit) was significantly higher in the AOM group compared with R-ESG group (67% versus 35%, p=0.012). The additional TBWL after R-ESG was significantly (both clinically and statistically) better than after initiation of AOM (9.5±7.2% versus 2.1±8.6%, p=0.001). Final TBWL clearly favored R-ESG over AOM for treatment of weight recidivism (19.9±10.4% versus 13.6±9.2%, p=0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: R-ESG is an effective treatment to induce weight loss after experiencing weight recidivism. These results highlight an important advantage of ESG as a repeatable minimally-invasive procedure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app