Do Racial and Ethnic Disparities Exist in Management of Pediatric Mandible Fractures? A 30-Year Outcome Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mandibular fractures are the most common of pediatric facial fractures. The effect of race on management/outcomes in these injuries has not been previously studied. Given the significant association between race and healthcare outcomes in many other pediatric conditions, an in-depth study of race as related to mandibular fractures in the pediatric patient population is warranted.

METHODS: This was a 30-year retrospective, longitudinal study of pediatric patients who presented to a single institution with mandibular fractures. Patient data were compared between patients of different races and ethnicities. Demographic variables, injury characteristics, and treatment variables were analyzed to find predictors of surgical treatment and posttreatment complications.

RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 49.5% were White, 43.9% were Black, 0.0% were Asian, and 6.6% were classified as "other." Black and "other" patients were more likely than their White counterparts to be injured as pedestrians (P = 0.0005). Black patients were also more likely than White patients or "other" patients to be injured by assault than by sports-related injuries or animal-related accidents (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0018, respectively). Race or ethnicity were not found to be a predictor of receiving surgical treatment (ORIF) or of posttreatment complications. The posttreatment rates for all the complications observed were comparable among all race and ethnic groups. Higher mandible injury severity score (odds ratio [OR], 1.25), condyle fracture (OR, 2.58), and symphysis fracture (OR, 3.20) were positively correlated with receiving ORIF as treatment. Mandible body fracture (OR, 0.36), parasymphyseal fracture (OR, 0.34), bilateral mandible fracture (OR, 0.48), and multiple mandibular fractures (OR, 0.34) were negatively correlated with receiving ORIF as treatment. Only high mandible injury severity score (OR, 1.10) was identified as an independent predictor of posttreatment complications. Lastly, Maryland's transition to an all-payer model in 2014 also had no impact on treatment modality; treatment of fractures among race and ethnicity were not significantly different pre- and post-2014.

CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in how patients are treated (surgically vs nonsurgically) and no difference in outcomes for patients based on race at our institution. This could be due to institutional ideology, services provided by a tertiary care center, or simply the more diverse patient population at baseline.