We have located links that may give you full text access.
Retrograde urethrography in children: a decade of experience at a children's hospital.
Pediatric Radiology 2023 May
BACKGROUND: Retrograde urethrography (RUG) is a radiologic procedure that optimizes imaging evaluation of the urethra, particularly in settings of difficulty with micturition or urethral injury.
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with RUG at a large pediatric radiology practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and fluoroscopic images of RUGs performed from January 2010 to December 2020.
RESULTS: We identified 180 RUG exams (median frequency 17 exams per year), all in male children (median age 13 years). The most common indications were stricture (42%; n=76), postsurgical evaluation (34%; n=62) and trauma (16%; n=29). The most commonly used catheter was Foley (40%; n=72), with a median catheter size of 5 French (Fr) for infants younger than 1 year, 7 Fr for children ages 1-5 years and 8 Fr for children older than 5 years. About a third of the children (57; 32%) had combined voiding cystourethrography (VCUG)-RUG exams. Water-soluble contrast agent, either 17% or 43% Cysto-Conray, was used. Most RUG exams were normal (46%; n=83). The most common urethral pathology was stricture (30%; n=54), commonly involving a bulbar urethra (n=26). Urethral trauma was seen in 11 children (6%), 10 bulbar and 1 membranous. Most children with stricture were surgically treated (n=40; 74%), whereas most children with trauma were conservatively treated (n=8; 73%). The remaining diagnoses included diverticula, polyps, valves, fistulas and duplications, constituting <17% of our sample; most of these were surgically treated. Four exams (2%) were non-diagnostic. RUG showed 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity compared to cystourethroscopy/VCUG findings. Technical difficulties occurred in 14 (8%) children (e.g., pain or inappropriate catheter seal).
CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that when catheterization techniques are properly tailored, RUG provides a useful and successful radiologic method of evaluating the pediatric male urethra.
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with RUG at a large pediatric radiology practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records and fluoroscopic images of RUGs performed from January 2010 to December 2020.
RESULTS: We identified 180 RUG exams (median frequency 17 exams per year), all in male children (median age 13 years). The most common indications were stricture (42%; n=76), postsurgical evaluation (34%; n=62) and trauma (16%; n=29). The most commonly used catheter was Foley (40%; n=72), with a median catheter size of 5 French (Fr) for infants younger than 1 year, 7 Fr for children ages 1-5 years and 8 Fr for children older than 5 years. About a third of the children (57; 32%) had combined voiding cystourethrography (VCUG)-RUG exams. Water-soluble contrast agent, either 17% or 43% Cysto-Conray, was used. Most RUG exams were normal (46%; n=83). The most common urethral pathology was stricture (30%; n=54), commonly involving a bulbar urethra (n=26). Urethral trauma was seen in 11 children (6%), 10 bulbar and 1 membranous. Most children with stricture were surgically treated (n=40; 74%), whereas most children with trauma were conservatively treated (n=8; 73%). The remaining diagnoses included diverticula, polyps, valves, fistulas and duplications, constituting <17% of our sample; most of these were surgically treated. Four exams (2%) were non-diagnostic. RUG showed 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity compared to cystourethroscopy/VCUG findings. Technical difficulties occurred in 14 (8%) children (e.g., pain or inappropriate catheter seal).
CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that when catheterization techniques are properly tailored, RUG provides a useful and successful radiologic method of evaluating the pediatric male urethra.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app