We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical, microbiological and biochemical impact of a supportive care protocol with an air polishing device, after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: Randomized clinical trial.
Clinical Oral Implants Research 2023 Februrary 15
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) protocol after surgical therapy of peri-implantitis, combining ultrasonic mechanical debridement and glycine powder air-polishing.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty subjects diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated by means of access flap were randomized six months later into two different SPIC groups: the test group combined a piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation with a specific implant PEEK tip and glycine powder air-polishing while control group received the same ultrasonic instrumentation together with a rubber cup and a polishing paste. Patients were followed for 12 months, with intermediate SPIC visits every 3 months. Clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical outcome variables were registered and calculated.
RESULTS: After 12 months of SPIC, probing depths (PD) showed a mean reduction of 0.33±0.11 mm, with significant differences (p<0.001) between the test (-0.84±0.43 mm) and the control group (+0.18±0.73 mm). Healthy peri-implant tissues defined by PD<5 mm, absence of BoP (or in only one site around the implant), and no additional bone loss (<0.5 mm), were observed at the final visit in 83% of the implants (87% in the test group and 80% in the control group, p=0.255). No adverse events were reported by the subjects participating in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPIC protocol including mechanical ultrasonic debridement and glycine powder air-polishing demonstrated significantly better efficacy in terms of PD reductions. A strict SPIC protocol can maintain for one year, or even improve, the results obtained after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty subjects diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated by means of access flap were randomized six months later into two different SPIC groups: the test group combined a piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation with a specific implant PEEK tip and glycine powder air-polishing while control group received the same ultrasonic instrumentation together with a rubber cup and a polishing paste. Patients were followed for 12 months, with intermediate SPIC visits every 3 months. Clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical outcome variables were registered and calculated.
RESULTS: After 12 months of SPIC, probing depths (PD) showed a mean reduction of 0.33±0.11 mm, with significant differences (p<0.001) between the test (-0.84±0.43 mm) and the control group (+0.18±0.73 mm). Healthy peri-implant tissues defined by PD<5 mm, absence of BoP (or in only one site around the implant), and no additional bone loss (<0.5 mm), were observed at the final visit in 83% of the implants (87% in the test group and 80% in the control group, p=0.255). No adverse events were reported by the subjects participating in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPIC protocol including mechanical ultrasonic debridement and glycine powder air-polishing demonstrated significantly better efficacy in terms of PD reductions. A strict SPIC protocol can maintain for one year, or even improve, the results obtained after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app