Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Geographic atrophy phenotypes in subjects of different ethnicity: Asia-Pacific Ocular Imaging Society Workgroup Report 3.

Ophthalmology Retina 2022 December 29
PURPOSE: To characterize geographic atrophy (GA) and to evaluate differences between Asians and non-Asians.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged ≥50 years with GA secondary to AMD in the absence of neovascularisation in the study eye and follow-up of ≥ 2 years.

METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective case series. GA lesion characterized at baseline and last follow-up based on multimodal imaging (fundus autofluorescence [FAF], near infrared [NIR], SD-OCT). Patients were grouped as either Asian or non-Asian descent.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of 1) phenotypes of GA lesions (size, foveal involvement, number of foci, drusen background, choroid background) and 2) growth rate of GA.

RESULTS: A total of 144 patients (169 eyes) with distribution of 50.9% Asians and 49.1% non-Asians. The age and gender were similar between Asians and non-Asians (Asians: mean age 77.2±10.1; 47.9% female; non-Asians: mean age 79.7±8.4; 58.7% female). Asians had thicker choroids (167±74μm vs 134±56μm, p<0.01) and lower prevalence of any drusen (40.7% vs 66.3%, p<0.01). At baseline, the GA area was smaller in Asians versus non-Asians (NIR 3.7±4.6mm2 versus 6.3±6.8mm2 , p=0.01; FAF 2.4±3.4mm2 versus 8.4±9.6mm2 , p<0.01). Asians had fewer GA foci (1.7±1.3versus 2.7±2.2, p<0.01) compared to non-Asians. The proportion with diffuse/banded FAF junctional zone pattern was similar between Asians and non-Asians (44.2% vs 60.2%, p=0.20). Asians had slower GA lesion growth rate compared to non-Asians (NIR 0.7 vs1.9 mm2 /year, p<0.01; FAF 0.3 versus 2.0 mm2 /year, p<0.01; NIR 0.4 vs 0.9mm/year, p<0.001 square root transformed; FAF 0.3 vs 1.0mm/year, p<0.001 square root transformed). Factors associated with GA lesion growth rate are (from highest effect size): ethnicity, junctional zone FAF pattern, baseline GA area, and number of GA foci. Higher GA lesion growth rate was observed in both Asian and non-Asian subgroups with drusen or lesion size and FAF patterns meeting inclusion criteria of recent therapeutic trials, but growth rate remained significantly slower in Asians. Eyes with baseline lesion ≥5mm2 showed the highest growth rate and difference between ethnicities was no longer significant. (2.6 vs 3.3 mm2 /year, p=0.09) CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in GA lesion phenotype, associated features and growth rate between Asians and non-Asians.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app