Open revascularization approach is associated with healing and ambulation after transmetatarsal amputation in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) allows for maintenance of ambulatory function for patients with significant forefoot tissue loss. Effective revascularization is key to optimizing limb salvage for patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). We hypothesized that CLTI patients requiring TMA will have better healing and functional outcomes with open bypass than with endovascular revascularization.

METHODS: Consecutive TMAs performed at three affiliated centers between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The baseline characteristics, including WIfI (wound, ischemia, foot infection) stage, noninvasive vascular studies, healing, and ambulatory outcomes, were collected. Catheter-based angiographic images were evaluated using the GLASS (global limb anatomic staging system). The primary outcomes were TMA healing and community ambulation. The secondary outcomes were TMA that had healed at study end, any ambulatory function postoperatively, major amputation, and mortality. Descriptive statistics and univariate, multivariable, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS: A total of 346 TMAs had been performed in 318 patients, 209 of whom had had peripheral artery disease (PAD). The median follow-up was 2.5 years. Patients with PAD had had significantly lower rates of healing compared with those without PAD (64% vs 77%; P = .007). Revascularization was performed in 185 limbs, with 102 treated endovascularly and 83 with open surgery. The patients who had undergone endovascular surgery were significantly less likely to have had the TMA healed at any point (55% vs 76%; P = .003) and less likely to have remained healed at study end (49% vs 66%; P = .02). Patients with GLASS stage 3 anatomy were significantly more likely to have healed after open surgery (75% vs 45%; P = .003). Long-term ambulation data were available for 72% of the revascularized patients. Endovascular surgery was associated with a lower likelihood of community ambulation after TMA (34% vs 57%; P = .002). On multivariable analysis, open surgery was significantly associated with TMA healing (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .007) and ambulation (odds ratio, 2.9; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS: For patients with CLTI and significant tissue loss requiring TMA, an initial open approach to revascularization was associated with improved healing and higher rates of ambulation compared with endovascular interventions. The metabolic requirement for healing of a TMA in patients with CLTI might be better met by open revascularization.