We have located links that may give you full text access.
The Association between Bundled Payment Participation and Changes in Medical Episode Outcomes among High-Risk Patients.
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2022 December 13
BACKGROUND: Bundled payments for medical conditions are associated with stable quality and savings through shorter skilled nursing facility (SNF) length of stay. However, effects among clinically higher-risk patients remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the association between participation in bundled payments for medical conditions and episode outcomes differed for clinically high-risk versus other patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective difference-in-differences analysis; Participants: 471,421 Medicare patients hospitalized at bundled payment and propensity-matched non-participating hospitals. Exposures were 5 measures of clinically high-risk groups: advanced age (>85 years old), high case-mix, disabled, frail, and prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization.
MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes were SNF length of stay and 90-day unplanned readmissions. Secondary outcomes included quality, utilization, and spending measures.
KEY RESULTS: SNF length of stay was differentially lower among frail patients (aDID -0.4 days versus non-frail patients, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.1 days), patients with advanced age (aDID -0.8 days versus younger patients, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3 days), and those with prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization (aDID -1.1 days versus patients without prior utilization, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.6 days), compared to non-frail, younger, and patients without prior utilization, respectively. BPCI participation was also associated with differentially greater SNF LOS among disabled patients (aDID 0.8 days versus non-disabled patients, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2 days, p < 0.001). Bundled payment participation was not associated with differential changes in readmissions in any high-risk group but was associated with changes in secondary outcomes for some groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes under medical bundles affected, but did not indiscriminately apply to, high-risk patient groups.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the association between participation in bundled payments for medical conditions and episode outcomes differed for clinically high-risk versus other patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective difference-in-differences analysis; Participants: 471,421 Medicare patients hospitalized at bundled payment and propensity-matched non-participating hospitals. Exposures were 5 measures of clinically high-risk groups: advanced age (>85 years old), high case-mix, disabled, frail, and prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization.
MAIN MEASURES: Primary outcomes were SNF length of stay and 90-day unplanned readmissions. Secondary outcomes included quality, utilization, and spending measures.
KEY RESULTS: SNF length of stay was differentially lower among frail patients (aDID -0.4 days versus non-frail patients, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.1 days), patients with advanced age (aDID -0.8 days versus younger patients, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3 days), and those with prior institutional post-acute care provider utilization (aDID -1.1 days versus patients without prior utilization, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.6 days), compared to non-frail, younger, and patients without prior utilization, respectively. BPCI participation was also associated with differentially greater SNF LOS among disabled patients (aDID 0.8 days versus non-disabled patients, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2 days, p < 0.001). Bundled payment participation was not associated with differential changes in readmissions in any high-risk group but was associated with changes in secondary outcomes for some groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes under medical bundles affected, but did not indiscriminately apply to, high-risk patient groups.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app