Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Staphylococcus aureus Nasopharyngeal Carriage and Antimicrobial Resistance among Adults with Sickle Cell Disease at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana.

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) patients are an important risk group for Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ) carriage and infections. Little is, however, known about the nasopharyngeal carriage epidemiology of the pathogen in this vulnerable population.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate S. aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) nasopharyngeal carriage prevalence, carriage determinants, and antimicrobial resistance among SCD adults in Ghana.

Methodology: Nasopharyngeal swabs, obtained from 200 SCD adults recruited at the Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, were cultured for S. aureus , and these isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing via the Kirby-Bauer method.

Results: The prevalence of S. aureus carriage was 41.5% (n = 83), and that of MRSA carriage was 1.0% (n = 2). Moreover, carriage of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) was the only determinant of S. aureus carriage identified (OR = 0.012, P  < .0001). However, neither this variable nor the other features of the participants emerged as a determinant of MRSA carriage. The antimicrobial resistance rates decreased across penicillin (98.8%, n = 82), tetracycline (54.2%, n = 45), gentamicin (32.5%, n = 27), ciprofloxacin (21.7%, n = 18), erythromycin (18.1%, n = 15), clindamycin (10.8%, n = 9), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10.8%, n = 9), teicoplanin (1.2%, n = 1), and linezolid (0.0%, n = 0), and the multidrug resistance rate was 45.8% (n = 38).

Conclusion: The nasopharyngeal carriage prevalence of S. aureus in the current study was high, while that of MRSA was low. The isolates were highly resistant to several of the antibiotics tested, but not teicoplanin and linezolid, making these antibiotics suitable for treatment of S. aureus infections among the SCD population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app