We have located links that may give you full text access.
Use and accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis for ovarian masses in children and adolescents.
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 2022 October 7
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Describe current practice patterns and diagnostic accuracy of frozen section (FS) pathology for children and adolescents with ovarian masses.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from 2018 to 2021 SETTING: 11 children's hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Females age 6-21 years undergoing surgical management of an ovarian mass INTERVENTIONS: Obtaining intraoperative FS pathology MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Diagnostic accuracy of FS pathology RESULTS: Of 691 patients undergoing surgical management of an ovarian mass, FS was performed in 27 (3.9%), of which 9 (33.3%) had final malignant pathology. Amongst FS patients, 12/27 (44.4%) underwent ovary-sparing surgery (OSS) and 15/27 (55.5%) underwent oophorectomy +/- other procedures. FS results were disparate from final pathology in 7/27 (25.9%) cases. FS had a sensitivity of 44.4% and specificity of 94.4% for identifying malignancy with a c-statistic of 0.69. Malignant diagnoses missed on FS included serous borderline tumor (n=1), mucinous borderline tumor (n=2), mucinous carcinoma (n=1), and immature teratoma (n=1). FS did not guide intervention in 10/27 (37.0%) patients: 9 with benign FS underwent oophorectomy and 1 with malignant FS did not undergo oophorectomy. Of the 9 patients who underwent oophorectomy with benign FS, 5 (55.6%) had benign and 4 (44.4%) had malignant final pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: Frozen sections are infrequently utilized for pediatric and adolescent ovarian masses and may be inaccurate for predicting malignancy and guiding operative decision-making. We recommend continued assessment and refinement of guidance before any standardization of use of FS to assist with intraoperative decision-making for surgical resection and staging in children and adolescents with ovarian masses.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from 2018 to 2021 SETTING: 11 children's hospitals PARTICIPANTS: Females age 6-21 years undergoing surgical management of an ovarian mass INTERVENTIONS: Obtaining intraoperative FS pathology MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Diagnostic accuracy of FS pathology RESULTS: Of 691 patients undergoing surgical management of an ovarian mass, FS was performed in 27 (3.9%), of which 9 (33.3%) had final malignant pathology. Amongst FS patients, 12/27 (44.4%) underwent ovary-sparing surgery (OSS) and 15/27 (55.5%) underwent oophorectomy +/- other procedures. FS results were disparate from final pathology in 7/27 (25.9%) cases. FS had a sensitivity of 44.4% and specificity of 94.4% for identifying malignancy with a c-statistic of 0.69. Malignant diagnoses missed on FS included serous borderline tumor (n=1), mucinous borderline tumor (n=2), mucinous carcinoma (n=1), and immature teratoma (n=1). FS did not guide intervention in 10/27 (37.0%) patients: 9 with benign FS underwent oophorectomy and 1 with malignant FS did not undergo oophorectomy. Of the 9 patients who underwent oophorectomy with benign FS, 5 (55.6%) had benign and 4 (44.4%) had malignant final pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: Frozen sections are infrequently utilized for pediatric and adolescent ovarian masses and may be inaccurate for predicting malignancy and guiding operative decision-making. We recommend continued assessment and refinement of guidance before any standardization of use of FS to assist with intraoperative decision-making for surgical resection and staging in children and adolescents with ovarian masses.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app