We have located links that may give you full text access.
Assessment of M-protein quantification using capillary electrophoresis and immunosubtraction-based integration in clinical samples with low M-protein concentrations.
Clinical Biochemistry 2022 September
OBJECTIVES: Quantification of monoclonal protein (M-protein) by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) is indispensable for diagnosing and monitoring monoclonal gammopathies. However, quantification of small and beta migrating M-proteins is challenging because of overlapping non-immunoglobulin and/or polyclonal immunoglobulin protein fractions. We compared a new integration method based on immunosubtraction (IS-CE) using capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) against the routine method, which includes a combination of perpendicular drop (0.4%), corrected perpendicular drop (1%) and tangent skimming (98.5%).
DESIGN & METHODS: The proposed method of M-protein quantification involves calculating the difference in area under the curve between the SPE and a class-specific IS-CE trace. We analyzed the difference in estimated M-protein concentrations obtained with the new method and routine integration methods using 913 samples. For IgA M-proteins at < 10 g/L, the estimated M-protein concentrations were compared with the total IgA concentration.
RESULTS: The median M-protein concentration of 913 consecutive samples was 6.2 g/L (IQR 2.1-14.3 g/L). The median and median % difference between the two integration methods was 0.68 g/L (IQR 0.01-1.55 g/L) and 10.9% (IQR 0.18-38.7%), showing a larger estimated M-protein concentration with the new method. More than 25% difference was observed in 38% of the samples and was associated with lower total protein concentration, lower M-protein concentration, IgA and IgM heavy chain isotypes, and beta- or beta-gamma migration. When 161 samples with IgA M-protein < 10 g/L were compared against total IgA concentration, the median bias of the new method was smaller compared to that of the existing method (-0.95 g/L vs. -1.3 g/L, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of IS based integration using CZE and IS-CE is promising especially for small and beta migrating M-proteins.
DESIGN & METHODS: The proposed method of M-protein quantification involves calculating the difference in area under the curve between the SPE and a class-specific IS-CE trace. We analyzed the difference in estimated M-protein concentrations obtained with the new method and routine integration methods using 913 samples. For IgA M-proteins at < 10 g/L, the estimated M-protein concentrations were compared with the total IgA concentration.
RESULTS: The median M-protein concentration of 913 consecutive samples was 6.2 g/L (IQR 2.1-14.3 g/L). The median and median % difference between the two integration methods was 0.68 g/L (IQR 0.01-1.55 g/L) and 10.9% (IQR 0.18-38.7%), showing a larger estimated M-protein concentration with the new method. More than 25% difference was observed in 38% of the samples and was associated with lower total protein concentration, lower M-protein concentration, IgA and IgM heavy chain isotypes, and beta- or beta-gamma migration. When 161 samples with IgA M-protein < 10 g/L were compared against total IgA concentration, the median bias of the new method was smaller compared to that of the existing method (-0.95 g/L vs. -1.3 g/L, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of IS based integration using CZE and IS-CE is promising especially for small and beta migrating M-proteins.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app