Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation in Unresectable Ewing Sarcoma: Final Results of a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the effect of radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation on outcomes in surgically unresectable Ewing sarcoma (ES)/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET).

METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with nonmetastatic unresectable ES/PNET (excluding intracranial/chest wall) receiving vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide chemotherapy, planned for definitive RT, were accrued in this single-institution, open-label, phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Randomization was between standard dose RT (SDRT; 55.8 Gy/31 fractions/5 days a week) versus escalated dose RT (EDRT; 70.2 Gy/39 fractions/5 days a week) with a primary objective of improving local control (LC) by 17% (65%-82%). Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and functional outcomes by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.

RESULTS: Between April 2005 and December 2015, 95 patients (SDRT 47 and EDRT 48) with a median age of 17 years (interquartile range, 13-23 years) were accrued. The majority of patients were male (59%). Pelvis was the most common site of primary disease (n = 60; 63%). The median largest tumor dimension (9.7 cm) and the median maximum standardized uptake value (8.2) on pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography were similar. At a median follow-up of 67 months, the 5-year LC, DFS, and OS for the entire cohort was 62.4%, 41.3%, and 51.9%, respectively. The 5-year LC was significantly better in EDRT compared with SDRT (76.4% vs 49.4%; P = .02). The differences in DFS and OS at 5 years (for EDRT vs SDRT) did not achieve statistical significance (DFS 46.7% vs 31.8%; P = .22 and OS 58.8% vs 45.4%; P = .08). There was a higher incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade >2 skin toxic effects (acute) in the EDRT arm (10.4% vs 2.1%; P = .08) with excellent functional outcomes (median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score = 29) in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS: EDRT results in improved LC with good functional outcomes without a significant increase in toxic effects. Radiation dose escalation should be considered for surgically unresectable nonmetastatic ES/PNET.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app