Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Correlation Between Dynamic 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography Data and Arthroscopic Testing of Scapholunate Instability: A Preliminary Study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the assessments of scapholunate (SL) instability status on 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) using wrist arthroscopy as a reference standard.

METHODS: Thirty-three patients (16 men, 17 women; mean age, 48 ± 13 years) with suspected SL instability were evaluated prospectively with 4D-CT and wrist arthroscopy. Based on the arthroscopic testing of SL joint, 2 groups were defined: group 1 (n = 8) consisted of patients who had no, or slight, SL malalignment in the midcarpal space and group 2 (n = 25) consisted of patients who had moderate or severe SL malalignment. Two independent readers, who did not know the arthroscopic findings, used 4D-CT to evaluate the SL gap, lunocapitate angle (LCA), and radioscaphoid angle (mean and range values) during radioulnar deviation.

RESULTS: The interobserver reliability was deemed good or excellent for most of the 4D-CT variables, except for the LCA range (moderate) and SL gap range (poor). For both readers, the SL gap mean, maximum, and minimum values were significantly higher (+67%, +78%, and +39%, respectively) and the LCA mean was significantly lower (-17%) in group 2 than in group 1. The radioscaphoid angle range values were lower (-34%) and the radioscaphoid angle mean values slightly higher (+4%) in group 2, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The SL gap range values were also higher (+86% for R1 and +40% for R2) and the LCA range values also lower (-50% for R1 and -31% for R2) in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative 4D-CT data corresponded well with the arthroscopic dynamic analysis of the SL joint in patients with suspected chronic SL instability.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app