We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Comparison of Transient Elastography, ShearWave Elastography, Magnetic Resonance Elastography and FibroTest as routine diagnostic markers for assessing liver fibrosis in children with Cystic Fibrosis.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Reliable markers are needed for early diagnosis and follow-up of liver disease in Cystic Fibrosis (CF). The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Transient Elastography (TE), Real-Time ShearWave Ultrasound Elastography (SWE), Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE) and the FibroTest as markers of Cystic Fibrosis Liver Disease (CFLD).
METHODS: A monocentric prospective cross-modality comparison study was proposed to all children (6 to 18 years of age) attending the CF center. Based on liver ultrasound findings, participants were classified into 3 groups: multinodular liver or portal hypertension (Nodular US/PH, advanced CFLD), heterogeneous increased echogenicity (Heterogeneous US, CFLD) or neither (Normal/Homogeneous US, no CFLD). The 4 tests were performed on the same day. The primary outcome was the FibroTest value and liver stiffness measurements (LSM).
RESULTS: 55 participants (mean age 12.6 ± 3.3 years; 25 girls) were included between 2015 and 2018: 23 in group Nodular US/PH, 8 in group Heterogeneous US and 24 in group Normal/Homogeneous US (including 4 with steatosis). LSM on TE, SWE and MRE were higher in participants with CFLD (groups Nodular US/PH and Heterogeneous US) compared to others (group Normal/Homogeneous US) (p<0.01), while FibroTest values did not differ (p = 0.09). The optimal cut-off values for predicting CFLD on TE, SWE and MRE were 8.7 (AUC=0.83, Se=0.71, Sp=0.96), 7.8 (AUC=0.85, Se=0.73, Sp=0.96) and 4.15 kPa (AUC=0.68, Se=0.73, Sp=0.64), respectively. LSM predicted the occurrence of major liver-related events at 3 years. TE and SWE were highly correlated (Spearman's ρ=0.9) and concordant in identifying advanced CFLD (Cohen's κ=0.84) while MRE was moderately correlated and concordant with TE (ρ=0.41; κ=36) and SWE (ρ=0.5; κ=0.50).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance of TE, SWE and MRE for the diagnosis of CFLD.
METHODS: A monocentric prospective cross-modality comparison study was proposed to all children (6 to 18 years of age) attending the CF center. Based on liver ultrasound findings, participants were classified into 3 groups: multinodular liver or portal hypertension (Nodular US/PH, advanced CFLD), heterogeneous increased echogenicity (Heterogeneous US, CFLD) or neither (Normal/Homogeneous US, no CFLD). The 4 tests were performed on the same day. The primary outcome was the FibroTest value and liver stiffness measurements (LSM).
RESULTS: 55 participants (mean age 12.6 ± 3.3 years; 25 girls) were included between 2015 and 2018: 23 in group Nodular US/PH, 8 in group Heterogeneous US and 24 in group Normal/Homogeneous US (including 4 with steatosis). LSM on TE, SWE and MRE were higher in participants with CFLD (groups Nodular US/PH and Heterogeneous US) compared to others (group Normal/Homogeneous US) (p<0.01), while FibroTest values did not differ (p = 0.09). The optimal cut-off values for predicting CFLD on TE, SWE and MRE were 8.7 (AUC=0.83, Se=0.71, Sp=0.96), 7.8 (AUC=0.85, Se=0.73, Sp=0.96) and 4.15 kPa (AUC=0.68, Se=0.73, Sp=0.64), respectively. LSM predicted the occurrence of major liver-related events at 3 years. TE and SWE were highly correlated (Spearman's ρ=0.9) and concordant in identifying advanced CFLD (Cohen's κ=0.84) while MRE was moderately correlated and concordant with TE (ρ=0.41; κ=36) and SWE (ρ=0.5; κ=0.50).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance of TE, SWE and MRE for the diagnosis of CFLD.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app