Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Longitudinal Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness and Reflectivity following Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation: An Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Study.

PURPOSE: To describe the changes in corneal epithelial thickness and reflectivity following simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).

METHODS: This was a prospective imaging study of 31 eyes of 29 patients who had undergone autologous or allogeneic SLET for limbal stem cell deficiency and had stable, avascular surfaces postoperatively. ASOCT scans of all four quadrants were taken preoperatively and at 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative time points in the eyes undergoing SLET. Baseline scans were also taken from the normal eye in unilateral cases. The following parameters were obtained from the scans: (i) epithelial thickness (ET), (ii) stromal thickness, (iii) total corneal thickness, (iv) epithelial reflectivity (ER), (v) stromal reflectivity, and (vi) epithelial/stromal (ES) reflectivity ratio.

RESULTS: Chemical injury (24 eyes, 77.4%) was the most common indication for surgery. There was a significant improvement in the ET (184.8 ± 117.1 vs 60.3 ± 10 µm, p < .0001) and ER (144.5 ± 26.4 vs 120.9 ± 28.9, p < .0001) within the initial postoperative period following SLET, which remained stable at the end of 1 year follow-up. There was no difference in the ET of the post-SLET and normal eyes after the 3-month timepoint and this normalization was maintained until the end of the first year. A significant normalization was also noted in the ES reflectivity ratio at the end of 1 year (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 1 ± 0.2, p < .001). A significant correlation was found between the final visual acuity and the total corneal thickness (r = 0.942, p = .005).

CONCLUSION: There is a significant improvement in the epithelial thickness and reflectivity of the cornea in eyes undergoing SLET. ASOCT provides a reliable objective measure of these changes and can be used to monitor the outcomes in these eyes postoperatively.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app