Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease: Cost of Transcatheter vs Surgical Management.

BACKGROUND: Surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR+CABG) is the recommended treatment for aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease; however, percutaneous coronary intervention at the time of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR+PCI) is used with increasing frequency.

METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adult admissions with a diagnosis of aortic stenosis. Subgroups of SAVR+CABG and TAVR+PCI formed the study group. Outcomes of interest included total hospitalization charges, temporal trends, in-hospital mortality, and complications.

RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2017, a total of 97 955 admissions (95.9%) received SAVR+CABG, and 4240 (4.1%) received TAVR+PCI; the proportion of TAVR+PCI increased from 1% in 2012 to 9.2% in 2017 (P < .001). Compared with patients receiving TAVR+PCI, admissions receiving SAVR+CABG were younger, more likely to be male, and had lower comorbidity (all P < .001). Adjusted in-hospital mortality was comparable in both groups (odds ratio 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.11; P = .45). Higher rates of pacemaker implantation, cardiac arrest, and vascular complications were seen in the TAVR+PCI group, whereas SAVR+CABG was associated with a greater requirement for prolonged ventilation. Admissions receiving TAVR+PCI had shorter lengths of hospital stay and were more likely to be discharged home. Nevertheless, the TAVR+PCI group had higher hospitalization charges compared with the SAVR+CABG group (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: There has been a steady increase in the use of percutaneous strategies for aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease management. In-hospital mortality was comparable in SAVR+CABG and TAVR+PCI groups, but despite shorter in-hospital stays, TAVR+PCI was associated with higher cardiac and vascular complication rates and hospitalization charges.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app