Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Flow characteristics and hemolytic performance of the new Breethe centrifugal blood pump in comparison with the CentriMag and Rotaflow pumps.

Blood pumps have been increasingly used in mechanically assisted circulation for ventricular assistance and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support or during cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. However, there have always been common complications such as thrombosis, hemolysis, bleeding, and infection associated with current blood pumps in patients. The development of more biocompatible blood pumps still prevails during the past decades. As one of those newly developed pumps, the Breethe pump is a novel extracorporeal centrifugal blood pump with a hybrid magnetic and mechanical bearing with attempt to reduce device-induced blood trauma. To characterize the hydrodynamic and hemolytic performances of this novel pump and demonstrate its superior biocompatibility, we use a combined computational and experimental approach to compare the Breethe pump with the CentriMag and Rotaflow pumps in terms of flow features and hemolysis under an operating condition relevant to ECMO support (flow: 5 L/min, pressure head: ~350 mmHg). The computational results showed that the Breethe pump has a smaller area-averaged wall shear stress (WSS), a smaller volume with a scalar shear stress (SSS) level greater than 100 Pa and a lower device-generated hemolysis index compared to the CentriMag and Rotaflow pumps. The comparison of the calculated residence times among the three pumps indicated that the Breethe pump might have better washout. The experimental data from the in vitro hemolysis testing demonstrated that the Breethe pump has the lowest normalized hemolysis index (NIH) than the CentriMag and Rotaflow pumps. It can be concluded based on both the computational and experimental data that the Breethe pump is a viable pump for clinical use and it has better biocompatibility compared to the clinically accepted pumps.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app