Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A modified Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting respiratory cytology specimens: Implications for estimates of malignancy risk and diagnostic accuracy.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) proposed a classification scheme for reporting cytologic specimens obtained from the respiratory system. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and risk of malignancy were reported for endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration but data for other sampling techniques has been poorly documented.

METHODS: In 2016, a modified version of the PSC guidelines was adopted at the University of Missouri for classification of sputum, bronchial washing, bronchial brushing, and fine-needle aspiration specimens. Specimens assigned to the negative category included all specimens containing evaluatable inflammatory or epithelial cells including benign appearing respiratory epithelium. Only specimens with marked artifactual distortion or obscuring blood or mucus were placed in the non-diagnostic category.

RESULTS: 672 bronchial washing specimens (479 with histology) and 511 bronchial brushings specimens (324 with histology) were reviewed. Washing specimens were classified as non-diagnostic (3%), benign (73%), atypical (10%), suspicious (4%), and malignant (10%). Bronchial brushing specimens were classified non-diagnostic (0.4%) benign (73%), atypical (6%), suspicious (3%), and malignant (17%). Malignancy risks for bronchial washings were insufficient (50%), benign (38%), atypical (62%), suspicious (83%), and malignant (98%). Risks of malignancy for bronchial brushings were insufficient (0%), benign (32%), atypical (79%), suspicious (75%), and malignant (94%).

CONCLUSION: Malignancy risks associated with bronchial washings and bronchial brushings are different than those reported for EBUS FNA. When the benign category includes specimens with "normal" appearing cellular elements, the risk of malignancy is substantial (between 32% and 38%).

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app