We have located links that may give you full text access.
Perineuriomatous nevi: a series of 8 cases highlighting unifying pathologic features to avoid misdiagnosis.
Journal of Cutaneous Pathology 2021 March 22
BACKGROUND: Perineuriomatous nevi are rare and diagnostically problematic. We report a series of 8 perineuriomatous nevi to highlight the diagnostic features.
METHODS: Cases were retrospectively reviewed and characterized.
RESULTS: Median age was 42.5 years (range 25-64), with equal sex distribution. Lesions occurred on the arm (n = 4), trunk (n = 2) and head/neck (n = 2). Median size was 7.5 mm (range 5-12 mm). Clinical differential diagnoses included atypical nevus (3), blue nevus (1), neurofibroma (1) and dermatofibroma (1). Lesions were circumscribed, dome-shaped (5/8), and biphasic (8/8) with nested epithelioid cells and wavy spindled cells arranged in whorled fascicles in a myxocollagenous stroma. When present, junctional growth was lentiginous (4/8). No cases displayed pleomorphism or mitoses. The perineuriomatous component stained positively for EMA (8/8 focal to diffuse) and CD34 (4/5 focal to diffuse). SOX10 and S100 protein stained all nevoid cells and in some cases a subset of intermingled spindled cells in perineuriomatous areas, where other melanocytic markers were negative. p16 protein expression was uniformly retained (3/3), and p53 negative (0/2). Nevoid cells in most lesions were positive for BRAFV600E (5/7). Ki67 was mildly elevated (~5%) in 3/3 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the histopathologic and immunophenotypic features in these unusual nevi helps avoid over diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
METHODS: Cases were retrospectively reviewed and characterized.
RESULTS: Median age was 42.5 years (range 25-64), with equal sex distribution. Lesions occurred on the arm (n = 4), trunk (n = 2) and head/neck (n = 2). Median size was 7.5 mm (range 5-12 mm). Clinical differential diagnoses included atypical nevus (3), blue nevus (1), neurofibroma (1) and dermatofibroma (1). Lesions were circumscribed, dome-shaped (5/8), and biphasic (8/8) with nested epithelioid cells and wavy spindled cells arranged in whorled fascicles in a myxocollagenous stroma. When present, junctional growth was lentiginous (4/8). No cases displayed pleomorphism or mitoses. The perineuriomatous component stained positively for EMA (8/8 focal to diffuse) and CD34 (4/5 focal to diffuse). SOX10 and S100 protein stained all nevoid cells and in some cases a subset of intermingled spindled cells in perineuriomatous areas, where other melanocytic markers were negative. p16 protein expression was uniformly retained (3/3), and p53 negative (0/2). Nevoid cells in most lesions were positive for BRAFV600E (5/7). Ki67 was mildly elevated (~5%) in 3/3 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the histopathologic and immunophenotypic features in these unusual nevi helps avoid over diagnosis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app