Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Presentation and management of type 1 laryngeal clefts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of injection laryngoplasty (IL) and endoscopic surgical repair for the treatment of type 1 laryngeal clefts (LC1) and to determine the most common presentations of LC1.

METHODS: Primary studies were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, OVID, and Cochrane Library using search terms laryngeal cleft and laryngotracheoesophageal cleft for articles published from database inception through August 2019. The search identified all articles pertaining to the symptomatology and management of LC1. Meta-analysis was performed on presenting symptoms and improvement of clinical symptoms and swallow function.

RESULTS: Twenty-four studies, comprising 713 patients with a mean age of 33.7 months (range 0-168 months), were included. The most common presenting symptoms were aspiration (80%, CI [55%-96%]), dysphagia (61%, CI [47%-74%]), and choking (57%, CI [37%-76%]). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was the most common comorbidity (68%, CI [51%-83%]) and premature birth comprised 27% [21%-32%] of the patients. Overall, 38% of patients received IL as a primary therapy. Prior to injection, 91% [87%-94%] of patients aspirated on swallow evaluations, and 62% [55%-68%] aspirated post-injection. At an average follow-up time of 6.8 months, 90% [70%-100%] of parents reported symptom improvement. An additional 54% of patients underwent endoscopic surgical repair as primary treatment. The rate of aspiration decreased from 73% [43%-94%] to 28% [13%-46%] after repair. At a mean follow-up of 14.2 months, 80% [67%-91%] reported symptom improvement.

CONCLUSION: A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary to detect LC1 since its most common presenting symptoms overlap with other diseases commonly found in this patient population. Both IL and formal surgical repair were effective in managing LC1.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app