Important factors in left atrial posterior wall isolation using 28-mm cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation -Block line or isolation area?

INTRODUCTION: Left atrial roof ablation using the cryoballoon technique, combined with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been reported to be beneficial for ablation therapy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Left posterior wall ablation also results in improved patient outcomes. However, the contribution of these techniques to the success of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) treatment of atrial fibrillation is not known. The present study examined the influence of roofline block and isolation area on outcomes after CBA.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 78 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Left atrial roof ablation was performed using a 28-mm cryoballoon with single freezing of 3 minutes at each region (median number of freezes: four) after PVI. After CBA, bipolar voltage amplitude mapping was performed during sinus rhythm using the NavX mapping system. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the voltage and activation map: the roof-conduction (n = 46) and roofline-block groups (n = 32). Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurred in 20 patients of the conduction group and 4 patients of the roofline-block group. The rate of 12-month freedom from tachyarrhythmia after a single ablation procedure was 78% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60%-89%] in the roofline-block group and 45% (95% CI 30%-60%) in the conduction group (P = 0.048). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the isolated area was not a significant predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.02, P = 0.15).

CONCLUSION: Creating a complete roofline block is the major factor predicting maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.