We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Effect of Dural Substitute and Technique on Cranioplasty Operative Metrics: A Systematic Literature Review.
World Neurosurgery 2018 November
BACKGROUND: Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy can be associated with significant morbidity. Dural substitutes during the initial decompression could improve outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of online peer-reviewed databases to determine the effect of dural substitutes during decompressive craniectomy on operative metrics and outcomes after subsequent cranioplasty.
RESULTS: Nine studies from 2006 to 2018 had reported the results from 922 patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty. Seven types of dural substitute were described, including biologic and synthetic materials. Compared with no graft, the use of dural substitutes was associated with significantly decreased operative times and surgical blood loss during subsequent cranioplasty. One study evaluated dual-layer substitutes and documented superior results compared with single layer. The most commonly reported complications were infection and cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, a significant reduction in complications was seen in only 1 study.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of dural substitutes was associated with superior operative metrics, complication rates, and long-term outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of online peer-reviewed databases to determine the effect of dural substitutes during decompressive craniectomy on operative metrics and outcomes after subsequent cranioplasty.
RESULTS: Nine studies from 2006 to 2018 had reported the results from 922 patients undergoing autologous cranioplasty. Seven types of dural substitute were described, including biologic and synthetic materials. Compared with no graft, the use of dural substitutes was associated with significantly decreased operative times and surgical blood loss during subsequent cranioplasty. One study evaluated dual-layer substitutes and documented superior results compared with single layer. The most commonly reported complications were infection and cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, a significant reduction in complications was seen in only 1 study.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of dural substitutes was associated with superior operative metrics, complication rates, and long-term outcomes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app